ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2013
Aggressive statin therapy and the risk of malignancy.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between statins and adverse events in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses of 47 randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of pharmacologic agents which partially inhibit the rate limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Co-A reductase) provided a major advance in preventive medicine. Clinical trials in both primary and secondary prevention have demonstrated reduction in cardiovascular events by statin therapy. However, early epidemiologic studies proposed an inverse relationship between cholesterol levels and mortality. While the epidemiologic studies were controversial and did not establish a cause and effect relationship, concern was raised that aggressive lipid lowering by pharmacological means may be associated with increased risk for noncardiac mortality, including malignancy. The theoretical concern was intensified by meta-analysis of statin trials, which confirmed the reduction in cardiovascular mortality but also demonstrated a potential increase in cancer risk. This review evaluates the epidemiologic and prospective trial data which address the potential relationship between aggressive statin therapy and the risk of malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.