Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23435468›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of andrology2013

No difference in high-magnification morphology and hyaluronic acid binding in the selection of euploid spermatozoa with intact DNA.

Suchada Mongkolchaipak, Teraporn Vutyavanich

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sperm DNA Fragmentation: A New Guideline for Clinicians.The world journal of men's health · 2020
    Review
  4. Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Some reflections on intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suchada MongkolchaipakAssisted Conception Center, Phyathai Sriracha Hospital, Cholburi 20110, Thailand.
Teraporn Vutyavanich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we compared conventional sperm selection with high-magnification morphology based on the motile sperm organellar morphology examination (MSOME) criteria, and hyaluronic acid (HA) binding for sperm chromosome aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation rates. Semen from 50 severe male factor cases was processed through density gradient centrifugation, and subjected to sperm selection by using the conventional method (control), high magnification at ×6650 or HA binding. Aneuploidy was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y, and DNA fragmentation by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) method. Spermatozoa selected under high-magnification had a lower DNA fragmentation rate (2.6% vs. 1.7%; P=0.032), with no significant difference in aneuploidy rate (0.8% vs 0.7%; P=0.583), than those selected by the HA binding method. Spermatozoa selected by both methods had much lower aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation rate than the controls (7% aneuploidy and 26.8% DNA fragmentation rates, respectively). In the high-magnification group, the aneuploidy rate was lower when the best spermatozoa were selected than when only the second-best spermatozoa were available for selection, but the DNA fragmentation rate was not different. In conclusion, sperm selection under high magnification was more effective than under HA binding in selecting spermatozoa with low DNA fragmentation rate, but the small difference (0.9%) might not be clinically meaningful. Both methods were better than the conventional method of sperm selection.

Indexed as

AneuploidyDNA FragmentationAdultChromosomes, Human, Pair 13Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21Chromosomes, Human, XChromosomes, Human, YHumansHyaluronic AcidIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID23435468
PMCPMC3739657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.