Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23435422›Full record

ArticleOncogene2014

MYC activity is negatively regulated by a C-terminal lysine cluster.

A R Wasylishen, M Kalkat, S S Kim, A Pandyra, P-K Chan, S Oliveri, E Sedivy, D Konforte, C Bros, B Raught and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multiple direct interactions of TBP with the MYC oncoprotein.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  3. Mission Possible: Advances in MYC Therapeutic Targeting in Cancer.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A R Wasylishen1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
M Kalkat1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
S S Kim1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A Pandyra1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
P-K ChanOntario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
S Oliveri1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
E Sedivy1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
D KonforteOntario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
C BrosOntario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
B Raught1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
L Z Penn1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Ontario Cancer Institute, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MYC oncogene is not only deregulated in cancer through abnormally high levels of expression, but also through oncogenic lesions in upstream signalling cascades. Modelling MYC deregulation using signalling mutants is a productive research strategy. For example, the MYC threonine-58 to alanine substitution mutant (T58A) within MYC-homology box 1 is more transforming than wild-type (WT) MYC, because of decreased apoptosis and increased protein stability. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms controlling T58 phosphorylation has led to new approaches for the development of MYC inhibitors. In this manuscript, we have extensively characterized a MYC signalling mutant in which six lysine residues near the highly conserved MYC homology box IV and basic region have been substituted to arginines (6KR). Previous literature suggests these lysines can undergo both ubiquitylation and acetylation. We show MYC 6KR is able to fully rescue the slow growth phenotype of HO15.19 MYC-null fibroblasts, and promote cell cycle entry of serum-starved MCF10A cells. Remarkably, 6KR increased anchorage-independent colony growth compared with WT MYC in both SH-EP and MCF10A cells. Moreover, it was also more potent in promoting xenograft tumour growth of Rat1A and SH-EP cells. Combined, our data identify this region and these six lysines as important residues for the negative regulation of MYC-induced transformation. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that, unlike T58A, the increased transformation is not a result of increased protein stability or a reduced capacity for 6KR to induce apoptosis. Through expression analysis and luciferase reporter assays, we show that 6KR has increased transcriptional activity compared with WT MYC. Combined, through a comprehensive evaluation across multiple cell types, we identify an important regulatory region within MYC. A better understanding of the full scope of signalling through these residues will provide further insights into the mechanisms contributing to MYC-induced tumorigenesis and may unveil novel therapeutic strategies to target Myc in cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenes, mycAnimalsCell DivisionHeterograftsHumansLysineNeoplasmsPhosphorylationProtein StabilityRatsLysine

Identifiers

PMID23435422
OpenAlexW2049406586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.