Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23435331›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2013

Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation.

Elzbieta Kolaczkowska, Paul Kubes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,921 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,921citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,921 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Thromborepair: the tissue repair partner to thromboinflammation.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2,861 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elzbieta KolaczkowskaSnyder Institute of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.
Paul Kubes

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils have traditionally been thought of as simple foot soldiers of the innate immune system with a restricted set of pro-inflammatory functions. More recently, it has become apparent that neutrophils are, in fact, complex cells capable of a vast array of specialized functions. Although neutrophils are undoubtedly major effectors of acute inflammation, several lines of evidence indicate that they also contribute to chronic inflammatory conditions and adaptive immune responses. Here, we discuss the key features of the life of a neutrophil, from its release from bone marrow to its death. We discuss the possible existence of different neutrophil subsets and their putative anti-inflammatory roles. We focus on how neutrophils are recruited to infected or injured tissues and describe differences in neutrophil recruitment between different tissues. Finally, we explain the mechanisms that are used by neutrophils to promote protective or pathological immune responses at different sites.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell AdhesionCell DeathCell DifferentiationCellular SenescenceChemokinesChemotaxis, LeukocyteEndothelium, VascularHumansImmunity, InnateInflammationMiceNeutrophil ActivationNeutrophil InfiltrationChemokinesReceptors, Chemokine

Identifiers

PMID23435331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.