Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23435217›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2013

Dual EGFR inhibition in combination with anti-VEGF treatment: a phase I clinical trial in non-small cell lung cancer.

Gerald S Falchook, Aung Naing, David S Hong, Ralph Zinner, Siqing Fu, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Sonia K Morgan-Linnell, Yunfang Jiang, Christel Bastida and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Revisiting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (JCO precision oncology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Treatment of Brain Metastases.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gerald S FalchookDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Phase I Program, U.T. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. gfalchoo@mdanderson.org
Aung Naing
David S Hong
Ralph Zinner
Siqing Fu
Sarina A Piha-Paul
Apostolia M Tsimberidou
Sonia K Morgan-Linnell
Yunfang Jiang
Christel Bastida
Jennifer J Wheler
Razelle Kurzrock
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Paul Calabresi Clinical Oncology AwardK12CA088084 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI David S. Hong, Scott Kopetz · 2000 to 2026
$14.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA088084NCI NIH HHS K12 CA088084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical data indicate EGFR signals through both kinase-dependent and independent pathways and that combining a small-molecule EGFR inhibitor, EGFR antibody, and/or anti-angiogenic agent is synergistic in animal models.

methodsWe conducted a dose-escalation, phase I study combining erlotinib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab. The subset of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was analyzed for safety and response.

resultsThirty-four patients with NSCLC (median four prior therapies) received treatment on a range of dose levels. The most common treatment-related grade ≥2 adverse events were rash (n=14, 41%), hypomagnesemia (n=9, 27%), and fatigue (n=5, 15%). Seven patients (21%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 months, two achieved a partial response (PR) (6%), and two achieved an unconfirmed partial response (uPR) (6%) (total=32%). We observed SD≥6 months/PR/uPR in patients who had received prior erlotinib and/or bevacizumab, those with brain metastases, smokers, and patients treated at lower dose levels. Five of 16 patients (31%) with wild-type EGFR experienced SD≥6 months or uPR. Correlation between grade of rash and rate of SD≥6 months/PR was observed (p less than 0.01).

conclusionThe combination of erlotinib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab was well-tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with NSCLC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCetuximabDose-Response Relationship, DrugErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideExanthemaFatigueFemaleGenotypeHumansLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCetuximabErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideQuinazolinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID23435217
PMCPMC3702212
OpenAlexW1486848115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.