Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23434973›Full record

ArticleAppetite2013

Within- and between-session variety effects in a food-seeking habituation paradigm.

Mark E Bouton, Travis P Todd, Olivia W Miles, Samuel P León, Leonard H Epstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Learning to inhibit the response during instrumental (operant) extinction.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark E BoutonDepartment of Psychology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. Mark.Bouton@uvm.edu
Travis P Todd
Olivia W Miles
Samuel P León
Leonard H Epstein

Funding

Extinction and Recovery in Associative LearningR01DA033123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BOUTON, MARK E · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
Translating Habituation Research to Interventions for Pediatric ObesityU01DK088380 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2009 to 2013
$2.9M
Temporal and Associative Aspects of Pavlovian LearningR01MH064847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BOUTON, MARK E · 2002 to 2011
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS 9R01DA033123NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033123NIDDK NIH HHS 1U01DK088380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK088380NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appetitive behavior is stronger when organisms are given a variety of foods than when they are repeatedly given the same food (the variety effect). Two experiments examined the variety effect in an operant food-seeking task. In both experiments, rats received a 45-mg food pellet for every 4th lever press over a series of daily 30-min sessions. The rats responded at a high rate early in the session, but the rate declined systematically over time within the session. In Experiment 1, alternating unpredictably between grain and sucrose pellets caused a higher level of responding, and a slower within-session decline in responding, than presenting either type of pellet consistently. In groups receiving one pellet consistently, a switch to the alternate pellet caused lawful changes in response rate that reflected both habituation and incentive contrast processes. In Experiment 2, an experimental group received grain only and sucrose only in daily alternating sessions. In sucrose sessions, they responded more than controls that always received either sucrose or grain (a type of variety effect); in grain sessions, they responded less than the controls. The results indicated a within-session variety effect that was controlled by habituation processes and a between-session variety effect that was controlled by incentive contrast. Both types of processes can come into play when organisms are exposed to food variety.

Indexed as

AnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantEdible GrainFeeding BehaviorFemaleHabituation, PsychophysiologicMotivationRatsRats, WistarReinforcement, PsychologySucroseSucrose

Identifiers

PMID23434973
PMCPMC3646953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.