Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23434633›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2013

The Rat Genome Database 2013--data, tools and users.

Stanley J F Laulederkind, G Thomas Hayman, Shur-Jen Wang, Jennifer R Smith, Timothy F Lowry, Rajni Nigam, Victoria Petri, Jeff de Pons, Melinda R Dwinell, Mary Shimoyama and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. HOPS-dependent endosomal fusion required for efficient cytosolic delivery of therapeutic peptides and small proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Web resources for model organism studies.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stanley J F LaulederkindHuman and Molecular Genetics Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226-3548, USA. slaulederkind@mcw.edu
G Thomas Hayman
Shur-Jen Wang
Jennifer R Smith
Timothy F Lowry
Rajni Nigam
Victoria Petri
Jeff de Pons
Melinda R Dwinell
Mary Shimoyama
Diane H Munzenmaier
Elizabeth A Worthey
Howard J Jacob

Funding

RAT GENOME DATABASER01HL064541 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI ANNE E. KWITEK · 1999 to 2026
$50.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL64541NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL064541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rat Genome Database (RGD) was started >10 years ago to provide a core genomic resource for rat researchers. Currently, RGD combines genetic, genomic, pathway, phenotype and strain information with a focus on disease. RGD users are provided with access to structured and curated data from the molecular level through the organismal level. Those users access RGD from all over the world. End users are not only rat researchers but also researchers working with mouse and human data. Translational research is supported by RGD's comparative genetics/genomics data in disease portals, in GBrowse, in VCMap and on gene report pages. The impact of RGD also goes beyond the traditional biomedical researcher, as the influence of RGD reaches bioinformaticians, tool developers and curators. Import of RGD data into other publicly available databases expands the influence of RGD to a larger set of end users than those who avail themselves of the RGD website. The value of RGD continues to grow as more types of data and more tools are added, while reaching more types of end users.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenomeAnimalsHumansMicePhenotypeRatsdatabasediseasegenomehumanrat

Identifiers

PMID23434633
PMCPMC3713714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.