ArticlePatient education and counseling2013
Patient-reported use of collaborative goal setting and glycemic control among patients with diabetes.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015Pooled it
- HbA1c as a shared treatment goal in type 2 diabetes? A secondary analysis of the DEBATE trial.BMC primary care · 2023Trial
- Comparison of Collaborative Goal Setting With Enhanced Education for Managing Diabetes-Associated Distress and Hemoglobin A1c Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Effect of Telephone-Delivered Collaborative Goal Setting and Behavioral Activation vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression Among Adults With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Visit Planning Using a Waiting Room Health IT Tool: The Aligning Patients and Providers Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of family medicine · 2019Trial
- Patient-centered care in diabetes care-concepts, relationships and practice.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- "Once I take that one bite": the consideration of harm reduction as a strategy to support dietary change for patients with diabetes.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Article
- Challenges in Improving Adherence to Diet and Drug Treatment in Hypercholesterolemia Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- User-Centered Design of a Clinical Tool for Shared Decision-making About Diet in Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Finding meaning: a realist-informed perspective on social risk screening and relationships as mechanisms of change.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Patient Experience with Their Health Care Provider Among Non-Pregnant Women of Childbearing Age with Diabetes Mellitus by Race and Ethnicity in the United States.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Patient and Clinician Characteristics Associated With Secure Message Content: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Racial differences in patient perception of interactions with providers are associated with health outcomes in type II diabetes.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- Classification of patient- and clinician-generated secure messages using a theory-based taxonomy.Health science reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of the Beyond Good Intentions Program on Improving Dietary Quality Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Associations Between Patient Health Outcomes and Secure Message Content Exchanged Between Patients and Clinicians: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- The Role of Perceived Discrimination and Other Psychosocial Factors in Explaining Diabetes Distress Among Older African American and White Adults.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLittle is known about how patient-clinician communication leads to better outcomes. Among patients with diabetes, we describe patient-reported use of collaborative goal setting and evaluate whether perceived competency and physician trust mediate the association between collaborative goal setting and glycemic control.
methodsData from a patient survey administered in 2008 to a cohort of insured patients aged 18+ years with diabetes who initiated oral mono-therapy between 2000 and 2005 were joined with pharmaceutical claims data for the prior 12 months and laboratory data for the prior and subsequent 12 months (N=1065). A structural equation model (SEM) was used to test mediation models controlling for baseline HbA1c.
resultsThe hypothesized mediation model was supported. Patient-reported use of more collaborative goal setting was associated with greater perceived self-management competency and increased level of trust in the physician (p<0.05). In turn, both greater perceived competence and increased trust were associated with increased control (p<0.05).
conclusionsFindings indicate that engaging patients in collaborative goal setting during clinical encounters has potential to foster a trusting patient-clinician relationship as well as enhance patient perceived competence, thereby improving clinical control. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Fostering collaborative goal setting may yield payoffs in improved clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.