Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23433326›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2013

Prevention of preterm birth by progestational agents: what are the molecular mechanisms?

Christopher Nold, Monique Maubert, Lauren Anton, Steven Yellon, Michal A Elovitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The pregnancy microbiome and preterm birth.Seminars in immunopathology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of a mucoinert progesterone nanosuspension for safer and more effective prevention of preterm birth.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
  17. Cervical alterations in pregnancy.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher NoldMaternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Christopher.Nold@uphs.upenn.edu
Monique Maubert
Lauren Anton
Steven Yellon
Michal A Elovitz
University of Pennsylvania · USLoma Linda University · USSt. Christopher's Hospital for Children · US

Funding

NEURAL REGULATION OF PREPARTUM CERVICAL RIPENINGR01HD054931 · NICHD · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI YELLON, STEVEN M · 2007 to 2016
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS HD054931NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinically, vaginal progesterone (VP) and 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) have been shown to prevent preterm birth (PTB) in high-risk populations. We hypothesize that treatment with these agents may prevent PTB by altering molecular pathways involved in uterine contractility or cervical remodeling. STUDY

designUsing a mouse model, on embryonic day (E)14-E17 CD-1 pregnant mice were treated with: (1) 0.1 mL of 25 mg/mL of 17P subcutaneously; (2) 0.1 mL of castor oil subcutaneously; (3) 0.1 mL of 10 mg/mL of progesterone in a long-lasting Replens (Lil' Drug Store Products, Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA); or (4) 0.1 mL of the same Replens, with 4 dams per treatment group. Mice were sacrificed 6 hours after treatment on E17.5. Cervices and uteri were collected for molecular analysis.

resultsExposure to VP significantly increased the expression of defensin 1 compared to Replens (P < .01) on E17.5. Neither VP nor 17P altered the expression of uterine contraction-associated proteins, progesterone-mediated regulators of uterine quiescence, microRNA involved in uterine contractility, or pathways involved in cervical remodeling. In addition, neither agent had an effect on immune cell trafficking or collagen content in the cervix.

conclusionNeither VP nor 17P had any effect on the studied pathways known to be involved in uterine contractility or quiescence. In the cervix, neither VP nor 17P altered pathways demonstrated to be involved in cervical remodeling. Administration of VP was noted to increase the expression of the antimicrobial protein defensin 1. Whether this molecular change from VP results in a functional effect and is a key mechanism by which VP prevents PTB requires further study.

Indexed as

17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone CaproateAdministration, IntravaginalAnimalsCervix UteriConnexin 43Cyclooxygenase 2FemaleHomeodomain ProteinsHydroxyprogesteronesKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMiceMicroRNAsPregnancyPremature BirthProgesteroneReceptors, Oxytocin17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone CaproateConnexin 43Cyclooxygenase 2Homeodomain ProteinsHydroxyprogesteronesKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMicroRNAsProgesteronePtgs2 protein, mouseReceptors, OxytocinSTAT5 Transcription FactorZEB1 protein, mouseZinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1

Identifiers

PMID23433326
PMCPMC3581865
OpenAlexW1994778356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.