Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23433316›Full record

ArticleDeveloping world bioethics2013

Evolving friendships and shifting ethical dilemmas: fieldworkers' experiences in a short term community based study in Kenya.

Dorcas M Kamuya, Sally J Theobald, Patrick K Munywoki, Dorothy Koech, Wenzel P Geissler, Sassy C Molyneux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developing world bioethics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Significance of Benefit Perceptions for the Ethics of HIV Research Involving Adolescents in Kenya.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorcas M KamuyaKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, 230, Kilifi, Coast 80108, Kenya. dkamuya@kilifi.kemri-wellcome.org
Sally J Theobald
Patrick K Munywoki
Dorothy Koech
Wenzel P Geissler
Sassy C Molyneux

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fieldworkers (FWs) are community members employed by research teams to support access to participants, address language barriers, and advise on culturally appropriate research conduct. The critical role that FWs play in studies, and the range of practical and ethical dilemmas associated with their involvement, is increasingly recognised. In this paper, we draw on qualitative observation and interview data collected alongside a six month basic science study which involved a team of FWs regularly visiting 47 participating households in their homes. The qualitative study documented how relationships between field workers and research participants were initiated, developed and evolved over the course of the study, the shifting dilemmas FWs faced and how they handled them. Even in this one case study, we see how the complex and evolving relationships between fieldworkers and study participants had important implications for consent processes, access to benefits and mutual understanding and trust. While the precise issues that FWs face are likely to depend on the type of research and the context in which that research is being conducted, we argue that appropriate support for field workers is a key requirement to strengthen ethical research practice and for the long term sustainability of research programmes.

Indexed as

Conflict of InterestConflict, PsychologicalFriendsTrustAdultClinical Trials as TopicCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEthics, ResearchFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInformed ConsentKenyaNegotiatingQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID23433316
PMCPMC3662996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.