Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23433045›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013

Protein structure based prediction of catalytic residues.

J Eduardo Fajardo, Andras Fiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Saturation Mutagenesis of the Transmembrane Region of HokC inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Basis for substrate recognition and distinction by matrix metalloproteinases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  12. Trends in structural coverage of the protein universe and the impact of the Protein Structure Initiative.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Eduardo FajardoDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Andras Fiser

Funding

The NYSGRC: A Large Scale Center for PSI:BiologyU54GM094662 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI ALMO, STEVEN C. · 2010 to 2014
$32.6M
Membrane protein structure modeling with experimental restraintsR01GM096041 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI FISER, ANDRAS · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM096041NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096041NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM094662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide structural genomics projects continue to release new protein structures at an unprecedented pace, so far nearly 6000, but only about 60% of these proteins have any sort of functional annotation.

resultsWe explored a range of features that can be used for the prediction of functional residues given a known three-dimensional structure. These features include various centrality measures of nodes in graphs of interacting residues: closeness, betweenness and page-rank centrality. We also analyzed the distance of functional amino acids to the general center of mass (GCM) of the structure, relative solvent accessibility (RSA), and the use of relative entropy as a measure of sequence conservation. From the selected features, neural networks were trained to identify catalytic residues. We found that using distance to the GCM together with amino acid type provide a good discriminant function, when combined independently with sequence conservation. Using an independent test set of 29 annotated protein structures, the method returned 411 of the initial 9262 residues as the most likely to be involved in function. The output 411 residues contain 70 of the annotated 111 catalytic residues. This represents an approximately 14-fold enrichment of catalytic residues on the entire input set (corresponding to a sensitivity of 63% and a precision of 17%), a performance competitive with that of other state-of-the-art methods.

conclusionsWe found that several of the graph based measures utilize the same underlying feature of protein structures, which can be simply and more effectively captured with the distance to GCM definition. This also has the added the advantage of simplicity and easy implementation. Meanwhile sequence conservation remains by far the most influential feature in identifying functional residues. We also found that due the rapid changes in size and composition of sequence databases, conservation calculations must be recalibrated for specific reference databases.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceBiocatalysisComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinEnzymesModels, MolecularNeural Networks, ComputerAmino AcidsEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID23433045
PMCPMC3598644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.