Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23433007›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2015

Bacterial isolates from infected wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern: some remarks about wound infection.

Lucinda J Bessa, Paolo Fazii, Mara Di Giulio, Luigina Cellini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 481 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Optimizing pathogen detection in skull base osteomyelitis: a comparative analysis of swab versus biopsy sampling.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Detachable dissolving microneedles loaded withFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Green synthesis of purpleMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Role of AprA and pyocyanin fromMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucinda J BessaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University 'G. d'Annunzio', Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Paolo Fazii
Mara Di Giulio
Luigina Cellini
University of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound infection plays an important role in the development of chronicity, delaying wound healing. This study aimed to identify the bacterial pathogens present in infected wounds and characterise their resistance profile to the most common antibiotics used in therapy. Three hundred and twelve wound swab samples were collected from 213 patients and analysed for the identification of microorganisms and for the determination of their antibiotic susceptibility. Patients with diverse type of wounds were included in this retrospective study, carried out from March to September 2012. A total of 28 species were isolated from 217 infected wounds. The most common bacterial species detected was Staphylococcus aureus (37%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), Proteus mirabilis (10%), Escherichia coli (6%) and Corynebacterium spp. (5%). Polymicrobial infection was found in 59 (27·1%) of the samples and was mainly constituted with two species. The most common association was S. aureus/P. aeruginosa. All Gram-positives were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. Gram-negatives showed quite high resistance to the majority of antibiotics, being amikacin the most active against these bacteria. This study is mostly oriented to health care practitioners who deal with wound management, making them aware about the importance of wound infection and helping them to choose the adequate treatment options to control microbial infection in wounds.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCorynebacteriumEscherichia coliFemaleHumansItalyMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedProteus mirabilisPseudomonas aeruginosaRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic susceptibilityGram-positive and Gram-negative bacteriaResistance patternWound infection

Identifiers

PMID23433007
PMCPMC7950398
OpenAlexW1529075884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.