Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23432827›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2013

Developmental trends in auditory processing can provide early predictions of language acquisition in young infants.

Weerasak Chonchaiya, Twila Tardif, Xiaoqin Mai, Lin Xu, Mingyan Li, Niko Kaciroti, Paul R Kileny, Jie Shao, Betsy Lozoff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Click-evoked auditory brainstem responses and autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Maturation in Prematurely Born Twin and Singleton Infants: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Students Aged Between 8 and 12 years.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. A Survey of Neonatal Nurses Perspectives on Voice Use and Auditory Needs with Premature Infants in the NICU.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Auditory Processing Differences in Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Prenatal organophosphate insecticide exposure and infant sensory function.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Low-level prenatal lead exposure and infant sensory function.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Weerasak ChonchaiyaCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, USA.
Twila TardifCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, USA.
Xiaoqin MaiCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, USA.
Lin XuChildren's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Mingyan LiChildren's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Niko KacirotiCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, USA.
Paul R KilenyCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, USA.
Jie ShaoChildren's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Betsy LozoffCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · TH

Funding

STATISTICAL COREP01HD039386 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOZOFF, BETSY · 2001 to 2011
$14.0M
Infant Word-Learning in English and ChineseR03HD060139 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TARDIF, TWILA Z · 2010 to 2011
$151k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD039386NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD39386NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD060139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory processing capabilities at the subcortical level have been hypothesized to impact an individual's development of both language and reading abilities. The present study examined whether auditory processing capabilities relate to language development in healthy 9-month-old infants. Participants were 71 infants (31 boys and 40 girls) with both Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and language assessments. At 6 weeks and/or 9 months of age, the infants underwent ABR testing using both a standard hearing screening protocol with 30 dB clicks and a second protocol using click pairs separated by 8, 16, and 64-ms intervals presented at 80 dB. We evaluated the effects of interval duration on ABR latency and amplitude elicited by the second click. At 9 months, language development was assessed via parent report on the Chinese Communicative Development Inventory - Putonghua version (CCDI-P). Wave V latency z-scores of the 64-ms condition at 6 weeks showed strong direct relationships with Wave V latency in the same condition at 9 months. More importantly, shorter Wave V latencies at 9 months showed strong relationships with the CCDI-P composite consisting of phrases understood, gestures, and words produced. Likewise, infants who had greater decreases in Wave V latencies from 6 weeks to 9 months had higher CCDI-P composite scores. Females had higher language development scores and shorter Wave V latencies at both ages than males. Interestingly, when the ABR Wave V latencies at both ages were taken into account, the direct effects of gender on language disappeared. In conclusion, these results support the importance of low-level auditory processing capabilities for early language acquisition in a population of typically developing young infants. Moreover, the auditory brainstem response in this paradigm shows promise as an electrophysiological marker to predict individual differences in language development in young children.

Indexed as

LanguageLanguage DevelopmentAcoustic StimulationAuditory ThresholdElectrophysiologyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHearingHumansInfantLearningMaleModels, NeurologicalSex FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23432827
PMCPMC3582039
OpenAlexW2093860914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.