Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23432621›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2013

Fragment-based drug discovery using a multidomain, parallel MD-MM/PBSA screening protocol.

Tian Zhu, Hyun Lee, Hao Lei, Christopher Jones, Kavankumar Patel, Michael E Johnson, Kirk E Hevener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Application of MM-PBSA Methods in Virtual Screening.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mathematical and computational modeling in biology at multiple scales.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tian ZhuCenter for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, University of Illinois at Chicago , 900 S Ashland Avenue, Suite 3100, Chicago, Illinois 60607-7173, United States.
Hyun Lee
Hao Lei
Christopher Jones
Kavankumar Patel
Michael E Johnson
Kirk E Hevener
University of Illinois Chicago · USAshland (United States) · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE ANALYSIS: PROTEIN SORTINGP41RR001081 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BABBITT, PATRICIA CLEMENT · 1985 to 2011
$17.6M
NTP INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT27305C0011 · NIEHS · Z-TECH CORPORATION · 2007 to 2009
$4.3M
Multidisciplinary Oral Science TrainingT32DE018381 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI COOPER, LYNDON F · 2008 to 2019
$3.6M
PROVIDE RABBITS, RATS, MICE, HAMSTERS, GERBILS, GUINEA PIGS27307C0011 · NIEHS · PI BOLEN, WAYNE · 2007 to 2007
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001081NIDCR NIH HHS 5T32-DE018381NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE018381NIEHS NIH HHS 27305C0011NIEHS NIH HHS 27307C0011NIEHS NIH HHS 27398C0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a rigorous computational screening protocol to identify novel fragment-like inhibitors of N(5)-CAIR mutase (PurE), a key enzyme involved in de novo purine synthesis that represents a novel target for the design of antibacterial agents. This computational screening protocol utilizes molecular docking, graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated molecular dynamics, and Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) free energy estimations to investigate the binding modes and energies of fragments in the active sites of PurE. PurE is a functional octamer comprised of identical subunits. The octameric structure, with its eight active sites, provided a distinct advantage in these studies because, for a given simulation length, we were able to place eight separate fragment compounds in the active sites to increase the throughput of the MM/PBSA analysis. To validate this protocol, we have screened an in-house fragment library consisting of 352 compounds. The theoretical results were then compared with the results of two experimental fragment screens, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) binding analyses. In these validation studies, the protocol was able to effectively identify the competitive binders that had been independently identified by experimental testing, suggesting the potential utility of this method for the identification of novel fragments for future development as PurE inhibitors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBinding, CompetitiveComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDrug DiscoveryDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysIntramolecular TransferasesLigandsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationPeptide FragmentsPeptide LibraryAnti-Bacterial AgentsIntramolecular TransferasesLigandsN(5)-carboxyaminoimidazole ribonucletide mutasePeptide FragmentsPeptide LibrarySmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID23432621
PMCPMC3752004
OpenAlexW2031889977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.