Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23432610›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Model-based evaluation of the pharmacokinetic differences between adults and children for lopinavir and ritonavir in combination with rifampicin.

Chao Zhang, Paolo Denti, Eric H Decloedt, Yuan Ren, Mats O Karlsson, Helen McIlleron

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02348177 phase4completednot on this map

A Pharmacokinetics Study Comparing Lopinavir Plasma Exposure When Given as Lopinavir/Ritonavir (1:1) in the Presence of Rifampicin and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (4:1) Without Rifampicin in HIV and TB Co-infected Children in South Africa.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDrugs for Neglected DiseasesRan2013 to 2016Enrolled96ConditionsAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, TuberculosisArmslopinavir with ritonavir in 1:1 ratio, Lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1
NCT03892161 phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation of Adjusted Doses of Darunavir/Ritonavir With Rifampicin in HIV-infected Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Cape TownRan2018 to 2018Enrolled17ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsDarunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg tablet, Rifampicin 600mg QD tablet and DTG 50mg BD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Getting to 90-90-90 in paediatric HIV: What is needed?Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao ZhangDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Paolo Denti
Eric H Decloedt
Yuan Ren
Mats O Karlsson
Helen McIlleron
University of Cape Town · ZAUppsala University · SE

Funding

South Africa Tuberculosis/AIDS TrainingU2RTW007373 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VAN DER HORST, CHARLES MICHAEL · 2007 to 2012
$1.4M
FIC NIH HHS U2R TW007373PHS HHS U2RTW007373ICOHRTAWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 083851/Z/07/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRifampicin profoundly reduces lopinavir concentrations. Doubled doses of lopinavir/ritonavir compensate for the effect of rifampicin in adults, but fail to provide adequate lopinavir concentrations in young children on rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy. The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing the pharmacokinetic differences of lopinavir and ritonavir, with and without rifampicin, between children and adults.

methodsAn integrated population pharmacokinetic model developed in nonmem 7 was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in 21 HIV infected adults, 39 HIV infected children and 35 HIV infected children with tuberculosis, who were established on lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy with and without rifampicin-containing antituberculosis therapy.

resultsThe bioavailability of lopinavir was reduced by 25% in adults whereas children on antituberculosis treatment experienced a 59% reduction, an effect that was moderated by the dose of ritonavir. Conversely, rifampicin increased oral clearance of both lopinavir and ritonavir to a lesser extent in children than in adults. Rifampicin therapy in administered doses increased CL of lopinavir by 58% in adults and 48% in children, and CL of ritonavir by 34% and 22% for adults and children, respectively. In children, the absorption half-life of lopinavir and the mean transit time of ritonavir were lengthened, compared with those in adults.

conclusionsThe model characterized important differences between adults and children in the effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir. As adult studies cannot reliably predict their magnitude in children, drug-drug interactions should be evaluated in paediatric patient populations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAge FactorsAnti-HIV AgentsAntitubercular AgentsBiological AvailabilityChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDrug InteractionsFemaleHalf-LifeHIV InfectionsHumansInfantLopinavirMaleAnti-HIV AgentsAntitubercular AgentsLopinavirRifampinRitonaviradultschildrenlopinavir/ritonavirnonmempopulation pharmacokineticsrifampicin

Identifiers

PMID23432610
PMCPMC3853533
OpenAlexW1584321696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.