Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23431106›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Novel CDH1 germline mutations identified in Chinese gastric cancer patients.

Qin-Hua Chen, Wei Deng, Xiao-Wei Li, Xiu-Fang Liu, Jing-Mei Wang, Li-Feng Wang, Nong Xiao, Qiong He, Ya-Ping Wang, Yi-Mei Fan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frequency ofCancers · 2021
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cell-Free DNA: Hope and Potential Application in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qin-Hua ChenDepartment of Medical Genetics, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu Province, China.
Wei Deng
Xiao-Wei Li
Xiu-Fang Liu
Jing-Mei Wang
Li-Feng Wang
Nong Xiao
Qiong He
Ya-Ping Wang
Yi-Mei Fan
Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo give a comprehensive report of E-cadherin gene (CDH1) variations in a population at a high risk for gastric cancer (GC).

methodsThe samples consisted of 178 men and 58 women with a mean age of 62.3 ± 9.4 years and an age range of 30-84 years. A total of 240 cancer-free controls were recruited (mean age of 61.8 ± 10.1 years, age range of 26-82 years). Samples were screened for CDH1 germline mutations by high-resolution melting analysis or directly sequencing. Luciferase reporter assay, RNA splicing assay and bioinformatic analysis were used to evaluate the effect of mutations.

resultsFour novel CDH1 sequence alterations were identified in GC patients including a G>T transition 49 bp before the start codon; a three-nucleotide deletion, c.44_46del TGC; one missense mutation, c.604G>A (V202I); and one variation in the intron, c.1320+7A>G. In addition, polymorphism frequencies were observed for CDH1-164delT, -161C>A, -73A>C, c.48+6C>T, c.48+62_48+63delinsCGTGCCCCAGCCC, c.894C>T (A298A), c.1224G>A (A408A), c.1888C>G (L630V), c.2076T>C (A692A), and c.2253C>T (N751N) which is similar to the data reported in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/. RNA splicing analysis suggested that the c.1320+7A>G and c.1224G>A variations did not affect exon splicing ability. Luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that the c.-49T variation might be helpful for E-cadherin transcription, though the increase in transcription activity is limited (only 33%). SIFT score and PolyPhen analysis both demonstrated that the L630V missense mutation probably damages protein function, while the V202I variant does not.

conclusionThis study reveals novel mutations in sporadic GC patients which had been poorly investigated for susceptibility genes.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDAsian PeopleCadherinsCase-Control StudiesChinaChi-Square DistributionDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, ReporterGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAntigens, CDCadherinsCDH1 protein, humanCDH1Gastric cancerGermline mutationLuciferase reporter assayRNA splicing analysis

Identifiers

PMID23431106
PMCPMC3574889
OpenAlexW1993705193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.