ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with natural orifice specimen extraction.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laparoscopic colon and rectal resections with intracorporeal anastomosis and trans-vaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer. A case series and systematic literature review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015Pooled it
- Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: a systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Article
- Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Natural orifice specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: patient selection and perspectives.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Success rate of natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic colorectal resections.Techniques in coloproctology · 2017Article
- Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2015Review
- A new technique of totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for large rectal adenoma.Techniques in coloproctology · 2015Article
- Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo introduce transvaginal or transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery to avoid an abdominal incision.
methodsBetween January 2009 and December 2011, 21 patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic radical resection and the specimen was retrieved by two different ways: transvaginal or transanal rectal removal. Transvaginal specimen extraction approach was strictly limited to elderly post-menopausal women who need hysterectomy. Patients aged between 30 and 80 years, with a body mass index of less than 30 kg/m², underwent elective surgery. The surgical technique and the outcomes related to the specimen extraction, such as duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and the complications were retrospectively reviewed.
resultsLaparoscopic resection using a natural orifice removal approach was successful in all of the 21 patients. Median operating time was 185 min (range, 122-260 min) and the estimated blood loss was 48 mL. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.5 d (range, 2-11 d). One patient developed postoperative ileus and had an extended hospital stay. The patient complained of minimal pain. There were no postoperative complications or surgery-associated death. The mean size of the lesion was 2.8 cm (range, 1.8-6.0 cm), and the mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 18.7 (range, 8-27). At a mean follow-up of 20.6 mo (range, 10-37 mo), there were no functional disorders associated with the transvaginal and transanal specimen extraction.
conclusionTransvaginal or transanal extraction in L-TME is a safe and effective procedure. Natural orifice specimen extraction can avoid the abdominal wall incision and its potential complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.