Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23430661›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2013

Drug development for rare mitochondrial disorders.

Orest Hurko

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Orest HurkoClinical Translational Medicine, 19 Sugar Knoll Drive, Suite 203, Devon, PA 19333-1558, USA. hurko@ctmclinical.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, all treatment of mitochondrial disorders is performed with dietary supplements or by off-label use of drugs approved for other indications. The present challenge is translation of our collective knowledge of the molecular details underlying the pathophysiology of mitochondrial disorders into safe and effective therapies that are approved by the regulatory authorities. Molecular details permit precise diagnoses, but homogeneity is gained at the expense of limiting numbers of subjects for clinical trials and of small markets from which to recoup the considerable expense of drug discovery and development. The Food and Drug Administration recognizes that trial designs suitable for common diseases are often not feasible for rare disorders. They have developed a number of programs to facilitate development of novel therapies for such rare diseases, without compromise of regulatory standards. With advances in technology, including the use of biomarkers, replacement therapies and sophisticated trial designs, both biotechnology firms and, increasingly, large integrated pharmaceutical companies, are taking advantage of the opportunities in rare disorders. Precise molecular delineation of pathophysiology and of responsive patients has led to success rates with rare diseases that are significantly greater than those for common disorders. It appears likely, but not yet proven, that this may now be the case for rare mitochondrial disorders as well.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDietary SupplementsDrug ApprovalHumansLegislation, DrugMitochondrial DiseasesNervous System DiseasesOff-Label UseOrphan Drug ProductionRare DiseasesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23430661
PMCPMC3625383
OpenAlexW2039540513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.