Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23430579›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2013

Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: the translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework.

Richard Spoth, Louise A Rohrbach, Mark Greenberg, Philip Leaf, C Hendricks Brown, Abigail Fagan, Richard F Catalano, Mary Ann Pentz, Zili Sloboda, J David Hawkins and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
50.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Caregiver Participation Engagement in Child Mental Health Prevention Programs: a Systematic Review.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Engaging Latino Families in a Sibling-Focused Family Prevention Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Investigating active ingredients of the GenerationPMTO intervention: Predictors of postintervention change trajectories in parenting practices.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2022
    Trial
  6. Effects of the Family Check-Up 4 Health on Parenting and Child Behavioral Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Care.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The Closing Digital Divide: Delivery Modality and Family Attendance in the Pathways for African American Success (PAAS) Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  10. Predictors of Participation in an eHealth, Family-Based Preventive Intervention for Hispanic Youth.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Building Local Infrastructure for Community Adoption of Science-Based Prevention: The Role of Coalition Functioning.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2015
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Prevention trial in the Cherokee Nation: design of a randomized community trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2015
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Randomized Effectiveness Trial of the New Beginnings Program for Divorced Families with Children and Adolescents.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Trial

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Richard SpothPartnerships in Prevention Institute, Iowa State University, 2625 North Loop Dr., Suite 2400, Ames, IA 50010, USA. rlspoth@iastate.edu
Louise A Rohrbach
Mark Greenberg
Philip Leaf
C Hendricks Brown
Abigail Fagan
Richard F Catalano
Mary Ann Pentz
Zili Sloboda
J David Hawkins
Society for Prevention Research Type 2 Translational Task Force Members and Contributing Authors
Southern California University for Professional Studies · USUniversity of Washington · USFlorida State University · USJBS International (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USPennsylvania State University · USPrevention Institute · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
INNOVATIVE IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH METHODS COREP30DA027828 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BROWN, C. HENDRICKS, MUSTANSKI, BRIAN · 2011 to 2020
$11.4M
Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TOLNAY, STEWART E · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
Society for Prevention Research Annual MeetingsR13DA021047 · NIDA · SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH, INC. · PI COLLINS, LINDA M · 2006 to 2010
$686k
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828NIDA NIH HHS 5R13DA021047-08SINIDA NIH HHS 5R13DA021047-09NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA027828NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS R13 DA021047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based preventive interventions developed over the past two decades represent great potential for enhancing public health and well-being. Research confirming the limited extent to which these interventions have been broadly and effectively implemented, however, indicates much progress is needed to achieve population-level impact. In part, progress requires Type 2 translation research that investigates the complex processes and systems through which evidence-based interventions are adopted, implemented, and sustained on a large scale, with a strong orientation toward devising empirically-driven strategies for increasing their population impact. In this article, we address two core challenges to the advancement of T2 translation research: (1) building infrastructure and capacity to support systems-oriented scaling up of evidence-based interventions, with well-integrated practice-oriented T2 research, and (2) developing an agenda and improving research methods for advancing T2 translation science. We also summarize a heuristic "Translation Science to Population Impact (TSci Impact) Framework." It articulates key considerations in addressing the core challenges, with three components that represent: (1) four phases of translation functions to be investigated (pre-adoption, adoption, implementation, and sustainability); (2) the multiple contexts in which translation occurs, ranging from community to national levels; and (3) necessary practice and research infrastructure supports. Discussion of the framework addresses the critical roles of practitioner-scientist partnerships and networks, governmental agencies and policies at all levels, plus financing partnerships and structures, all required for both infrastructure development and advances in the science. The article concludes with two sets of recommended action steps that could provide impetus for advancing the next generation of T2 translation science and, in turn, potentially enhance the health and well-being of subsequent generations of youth and families.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID23430579
PMCPMC3696461
OpenAlexW2002173750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.