Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23430220›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2013

What do aquaporin knockout studies tell us about fluid transport in epithelia?

Oliver J Maclaren, James Sneyd, Edmund J Crampin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Aquaporins in Glandular Secretion.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Aquaporins in the lung.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2019
    Review
  6. Tight junctions in pulmonary epithelia during lung inflammation.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2017
    Review
  7. Aquaporins in Salivary Glands: From Basic Research to Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oliver J MaclarenAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. omac010@aucklanduni.ac.nz
James Sneyd
Edmund J Crampin
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

An experimental/computational approach for understanding salivary fluid secretionR01DE019245 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI David I Yule · 2008 to 2026
$9.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of near-isosmotic water transport in epithelia goes back over 100 years; however, debates over mechanism and pathway remain. Aquaporin (AQP) knockouts have been used by various research groups to test the hypothesis of an osmotic mechanism as well as to explore the paracellular versus transcellular pathway debate. Nonproportional reductions in the water permeability of a water-transporting epithelial cell (e.g., a reduction of around 80-90 %) compared to the reduction in overall water transport rate in the knockout animal (e.g., a reduction of 50-60 %) are commonly found. This nonproportionality has led to controversy over whether AQP knockout studies support or contradict the osmotic mechanism. Arguments raised for and against an interpretation supporting the osmotic mechanism typically have partially specified, implicit, or incorrect assumptions. We present a simple mathematical model of the osmotic mechanism with clear assumptions and, for models based on this mechanism, establish a baseline prediction of AQP knockout studies. We allow for deviations from isotonic/isosmotic conditions and utilize dimensional analysis to reduce the number of parameters that must be considered independently. This enables a single prediction curve to be used for multiple epithelial systems. We find that a simple, transcellular-only osmotic mechanism sufficiently predicts the results of knockout studies and find criticisms of this mechanism to be overstated. We note, however, that AQP knockout studies do not give sufficient information to definitively rule out an additional paracellular pathway.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsAquaporinsBiological TransportEpitheliumOsmosisWaterAquaporinsWater

Identifiers

PMID23430220
PMCPMC3622118
OpenAlexW2136553339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.