Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23430020›Full record

ReviewOral and maxillofacial surgery2014

Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.

Cornelius von Wilmowsky, Tobias Moest, Emeka Nkenke, Florian Stelzle, Karl Andreas Schlegel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Measures of Corticalization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Research progress on the osseointegration of titanium implants promoted by cold atmospheric plasma].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelius von WilmowskyMund-,Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgische Klinik Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Glückstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany, cornelius.vonwilmowsky@uk-erlangen.de.
Tobias Moest
Emeka Nkenke
Florian Stelzle
Karl Andreas Schlegel
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn order to determine whether a newly developed implant material conforms to the requirements of biocompatibility, it must undergo rigorous testing. To correctly interpret the results of studies on implant material osseointegration, it is necessary to have a sound understanding of all the testing methods. The aim of this overview is to elucidate the methods that are used for the experimental evaluation of the osseointegration of implant materials. DISCUSSION: In recent decades, there has been a constant proliferation of new materials and surface modifications in the field of dental implants. This continuous development of innovative biomaterials requires a precise and detailed evaluation in terms of biocompatibility and implant healing before clinical use. The current gold standard is in vivo animal testing on well validated animal models. However, long-term outcome studies on patients have to follow to finally validate and show patient benefit.

conclusionNo experimental set-up can provide answers for all possible research questions. However, a certain transferability of the results to humans might be possible if the experimental set-up is carefully chosen for the aspects and questions being investigated. To enhance the implant survival rate in the rising number of patients with chronic diseases which compromise wound healing and osseointegration, dental implant research on compromised animal models will further gain importance in future.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone-Implant InterfaceDental MaterialsHumansMaterials TestingModels, AnimalOsseointegrationStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesBiocompatible MaterialsDental ImplantsDental Materials

Identifiers

PMID23430020
OpenAlexW1426096956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.