Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23429996›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica2013

EGFR wild-type amplification and activation promote invasion and development of glioblastoma independent of angiogenesis.

Krishna M Talasila, Anke Soentgerath, Philipp Euskirchen, Gro V Rosland, Jian Wang, Peter C Huszthy, Lars Prestegarden, Kai Ove Skaftnesmo, Per Øystein Sakariassen, Eskil Eskilsson and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Apelin/APJ: Another Player in the Cancer Biology Network.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Krishna M TalasilaDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, 5009, Bergen, Norway.
Anke Soentgerath
Philipp Euskirchen
Gro V Rosland
Jian Wang
Peter C Huszthy
Lars Prestegarden
Kai Ove Skaftnesmo
Per Øystein Sakariassen
Eskil Eskilsson
Daniel Stieber
Olivier Keunen
Narve Brekka
Ingrid Moen
Janice M Nigro
Olav K Vintermyr
Morten Lund-Johansen
Simone Niclou
Sverre J Mørk
Per Oyvind Enger
Rolf Bjerkvig
Hrvoje Miletic
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOLaboratoire National de Santé · LUUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is regarded as a hallmark of cancer progression and it has been postulated that solid tumor growth depends on angiogenesis. At present, however, it is clear that tumor cell invasion can occur without angiogenesis, a phenomenon that is particularly evident by the infiltrative growth of malignant brain tumors, such as glioblastomas (GBMs). In these tumors, amplification or overexpression of wild-type (wt) or truncated and constitutively activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are regarded as important events in GBM development, where the complex downstream signaling events have been implicated in tumor cell invasion, angiogenesis and proliferation. Here, we show that amplification and in particular activation of wild-type EGFR represents an underlying mechanism for non-angiogenic, invasive tumor growth. Using a clinically relevant human GBM xenograft model, we show that tumor cells with EGFR gene amplification and activation diffusely infiltrate normal brain tissue independent of angiogenesis and that transient inhibition of EGFR activity by cetuximab inhibits the invasive tumor growth. Moreover, stable, long-term expression of a dominant-negative EGFR leads to a mesenchymal to epithelial-like transition and induction of angiogenic tumor growth. Analysis of human GBM biopsies confirmed that EGFR activation correlated with invasive/non-angiogenic tumor growth. In conclusion, our results indicate that activation of wild-type EGFR promotes invasion and glioblastoma development independent of angiogenesis, whereas loss of its activity results in angiogenic tumor growth.

Indexed as

Transcriptional ActivationAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorCetuximabErbB ReceptorsGene AmplificationGenes, erbB-1GlioblastomaHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeovascularization, PathologicXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID23429996
PMCPMC3631314
OpenAlexW1998670627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.