Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23429933›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2013

Myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium scoring with a two-slice SPECT/CT system: can the attenuation map be calculated from the calcium scoring CT scan?

Christian Wenning, Kambiz Rahbar, Alexis Vrachimis, Otmar Schober, Michael Schäfers, Lars Stegger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian WenningDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building 1A, 48149 Münster, Germany. cwenning@uni-muenster.de
Kambiz Rahbar
Alexis Vrachimis
Otmar Schober
Michael Schäfers
Lars Stegger
University of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCoronary artery calcium scoring can complement myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using the CalciumScore-CT derived from a combined SPECT/CT device also for SPECT attenuation correction (AC).

methodsThe study group comprised 99 patients who underwent both post-stress and rest MPI using a two-slice SPECT/CT system. For AC, one of the two scans was accompanied by a CalciumScore-CT scan (CalciumScore-CTAC) and the other by a conventional spiral CT (AttenCorr-CT) scan (AttenCorr-CTAC). In 48 patients the CalciumScore-CT scan was acquired with the post-stress scan and the AttenCorr-CT scan with the rest scan, and in 51 patients the order was reversed. The accuracy of the images based on AC was determined qualitatively by consensus reading with respect to the clinical diagnoses as well as quantitatively by comparing the perfusion summed stress scores (SSS) and the summed rest scores (SRS) between attenuation-corrected and uncorrected images.

resultsIn comparison to the uncorrected images CalciumScore-CTAC led to regional inaccuracies in 14 of 51 of studies (27.5%) versus 12 of 48 studies (25%) with AttenCorr-CTAC for the stress studies and in 5 of 48 (10%) versus 1 of 51 (2%) for the rest studies, respectively. This led to intermediate and definite changes in the final diagnosis (ischaemia and/or scarring) in 12% of the studies (12 of 99) and in 7% of the studies (7 of 99) with CalciumScore-CTAC and in 9% of the studies (9 of 99) and 4% of the studies (4 of 99) with AttenCorr-CTAC. Differences in SSS and SRS with respect to the uncorrected images were greater for the CalciumScore-CTAC images than for the AttenCorr-CTAC images (ΔSSS 4.5 ± 5.6 and 2.1 ± 4.4, p = 0.023; ΔSRS 4.2 ± 4.9 and 1.6 ± 3.2, p = 0.004, respectively).

conclusionUsing the same CT scan for calcium scoring and SPECT AC is feasible. Image interpretation must, however, include uncorrected images since CT-based AC relatively often introduces artefacts into the myocardial perfusion images. This effect is somewhat more pronounced with CalciumScore-CTAC than with AttenCorr-CTAC.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalciumCoronary VesselsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedCalcium

Identifiers

PMID23429933
OpenAlexW1985981600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.