Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23427171›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2013

Stochastic multiplicative population growth predicts and interprets Taylor's power law of fluctuation scaling.

Joel E Cohen, Meng Xu, William S F Schuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Taylor's law of fluctuation scaling for semivariances and higher moments of heavy-tailed data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  2. Taylor's Law in Innovation Processes.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Chagas disease vector control and Taylor's law.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Sample and population exponents of generalized Taylor's law.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Random sampling of skewed distributions implies Taylor's power law of fluctuation scaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joel E CohenLaboratory of Populations, The Rockefeller University and Columbia University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. cohen@rockefeller.edu
Meng Xu
William S F Schuster

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taylor's law (TL) asserts that the variance of the density (individuals per area or volume) of a set of comparable populations is a power-law function of the mean density of those populations. Despite the empirical confirmation of TL in hundreds of species, there is little consensus about why TL is so widely observed and how its estimated parameters should be interpreted. Here, we report that the Lewontin-Cohen (henceforth LC) model of stochastic population dynamics, which has been widely discussed and applied, leads to a spatial TL in the limit of large time and provides an explicit, exact interpretation of its parameters. The exponent of TL exceeds 2 if and only if the LC model is supercritical (growing on average), equals 2 if and only if the LC model is deterministic, and is less than 2 if and only if the LC model is subcritical (declining on average). TL and the LC model describe the spatial variability and the temporal dynamics of populations of trees on long-term plots censused over 75 years at the Black Rock Forest, Cornwall, NY, USA.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNew YorkPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsStochastic ProcessesTime FactorsTrees

Identifiers

PMID23427171
PMCPMC3619479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.