Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23427083›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2013

Proximal tubule-dominant transfer of AT(1a) receptors induces blood pressure responses to intracellular angiotensin II in AT(1a) receptor-deficient mice.

Xiao C Li, Jia L Zhuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Angiotensin II and ATInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proximal Tubule-Specific Deletion of the NHE3 (NaHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Angiotensinogen and Megalin Interactions Contribute to Atherosclerosis-Brief Report.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao C LiLaboratory of Receptor and Signal Transduction, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Jia L Zhuo
University of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Role of Intracrine Angiotensin II in Kidney CellsR01DK067299 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI Jia Long Zhuo · 2004 to 2026
$6.5M
Novel Roles of Intracrine Angiotensin II in Proximal Tubule CellsR56DK067299 · NIDDK · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHUO, JIA LONG · 2009 to 2009
$352k
NIDDK NIH HHS 2R01DK067299-06A2NIDDK NIH HHS 2R56DK067299NIDDK NIH HHS 5R01DK067299NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067299NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK067299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of intracellular ANG II in proximal tubules of the kidney remains poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that proximal tubule-dominant transfer of AT(1a) receptors in the cortex mediates intracellular ANG II-induced blood pressure responses in AT(1a) receptor-deficient (Agtr1a-/-) mice. A GFP-tagged AT(1a) receptor, AT(1a)R/GFP, and an enhanced cyan fluorescent intracellular ANG II fusion protein, ECFP/ANG II, were expressed in proximal tubules of Agtr1a-/- mouse kidneys via the adenoviral transfer using a sodium and glucose cotransporter 2 promoter. Transfer of AT(1a)R/GFP alone or with ECFP/ANG II induced proximal tubule-dominant expression of AT(1a)R/GFP and/or ECFP/ANG II with a peak response at 2 wk. No significant AT(1a)R/GFP and/or ECFP/ANG II expression was observed in the glomeruli, medulla, or extrarenal tissues. Transfer of AT(1a)R/GFP alone, but not ECFP/ANG II, increased systolic blood pressure by 12 ± 2 mmHg by day 14 (n = 9, P < 0.01). However, cotransfer of AT(1a)R/GFP with ECFP/ANG II increased blood pressure by 18 ± 2 mmHg (n = 12, P < 0.01). Twenty-four hour urinary sodium excretion was decreased by day 7 with proximal tubule-dominant transfer of AT(1a)R/GFP alone (P < 0.01) or with AT(1a)R/GFP and ECFP/ANG II cotransfer (P < 0.01). These responses were associated with twofold increases in phosphorylated ERK1/2, lysate, and membrane NHE-3 proteins in freshly isolated proximal tubules (P < 0.01). By contrast, transfer of control CMV-GFP (a recombinant human adenovirus type 5 expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein under the control of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter), ECFP/ANG II, or a scrambled control ECFP/ANG IIc alone in proximal tubules had no effect on all indices. These results suggest that AT(1a) receptors and intracellular ANG II in proximal tubules of the kidney play an important physiological role in blood pressure regulation.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IIAnimalsBlood PressureBlotting, WesternDependovirusDrinkingElectrolytesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGenetic VectorsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsKidney Tubules, ProximalLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-2MAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutAngiotensin IICyan Fluorescent ProteinElectrolytesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-2Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1Slc5a2 protein, mouseSLC9A3 protein, humanSlc9a3 protein, mouseSodium-Glucose Transporter 2Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger 3Sodium-Hydrogen ExchangersVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID23427083
PMCPMC3627953
OpenAlexW1991673947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.