Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23426645›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2013

High-content adhesion assay to address limited cell samples.

Jay W Warrick, Edmond W K Young, Eric G Schmuck, Kurt W Saupe, David J Beebe

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jay W WarrickBiomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Edmond W K Young
Eric G Schmuck
Kurt W Saupe
David J Beebe
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Training Program in Translational Cardiovascular Science (TPTCS)T32HL007936 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lee Lochbaum Eckhardt, Gail A Robertson · 2001 to 2026
$11.6M
Understanding cell migration through microscale in vitro modelsR01EB010039 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J, HUTTENLOCHER, ANNA · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
Microchannel cell-based assays to enable cancer researchR33CA137673 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J · 2009 to 2011
$1.4M
Impact of chronic caloric restriction on resident progenitor cells in the heartR21HL092477 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SAUPE, KURT WILLIAM · 2008 to 2009
$511k
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA137673NHLBI NIH HHS 1R21HL092477NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL092477NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007936NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL 07936NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010039NLM NIH HHS 5T15LM007359NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell adhesion is a broad topic in cell biology that involves physical interactions between cells and other cells or the surrounding extracellular matrix, and is implicated in major research areas including cancer, development, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine. While current methods have contributed significantly to our understanding of cell adhesion, these methods are unsuitable for tackling many biological questions requiring intermediate numbers of cells (10(2)-10(5)), including small animal biopsies, clinical samples, and rare cell isolates. To overcome this fundamental limitation, we developed a new assay to quantify the adhesion of ~10(2)-10(3) cells at a time on engineered substrates, and examined the adhesion strength and population heterogeneity via distribution-based modeling. We validated the platform by testing adhesion strength of cancer cells from three different cancer types (breast, prostate, and multiple myeloma) on both IL-1β activated and non-activated endothelial monolayers, and observed significantly increased adhesion for each cancer cell type upon endothelial activation, while identifying and quantifying distinct subpopulations of cell-substrate interactions. We then applied the assay to characterize adhesion of primary bone marrow stromal cells to different cardiac fibroblast-derived matrix substrates to demonstrate the ability to study limited cell populations in the context of cardiac cell-based therapies. Overall, these results demonstrate the sensitivity and robustness of the assay as well as its ability to enable extraction of high content, functional data from limited and potentially rare primary samples. We anticipate this method will enable a new class of biological studies with potential impact in basic and translational research.

Indexed as

Biological AssayCell AdhesionCell SeparationEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesTissue Array Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23426645
PMCPMC3832292
OpenAlexW1964032547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.