Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23426401›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Cancer2013

Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: new avenues for therapy and research.

Emma Kipps, David S P Tan, Stan B Kaye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 362 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
362citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

362 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oncolytic adenovirus in treating malignant ascites: A phase II trial and longitudinal single-cell study.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

302 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma KippsThe Institute of Cancer Research/Royal Marsden Hospital, Medicine, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK.
David S P Tan
Stan B Kaye

Funding

Cancer Research UKWellcome Trust 094452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant ascites presents a considerable clinical challenge to the management of ovarian cancer, but also provides a wealth of opportunities for translational research. The accessibility of ascitic fluid and its cellular components make it an excellent source of tumour tissue for the investigation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, pharmacodynamic markers and for molecular profiling analysis. In this Opinion article, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of its pathophysiology, the development of new methods to characterize its molecular features and how these findings can be used to improve the treatment of malignant ascites, particularly in the context of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

AscitesOvarian NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAscitic FluidBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinDrainageFemaleHumansPaclitaxelParacentesisPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumPrognosisTranslational Research, BiomedicalBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID23426401
PMCPMC4673904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.