ArticleOncology letters2013
Phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and SMART-IMRT-based radiotherapy in locoregionally-advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Once-daily Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Thoracic Radiotherapy Compared With Twice-daily Radiotherapy in Limited Small-cell Lung Cancer Treated Concurrently With Cisplatin and Etoposide
A Prospective, Single-arm Study of Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiotherapy Combined With S-1/DDP for Elderly Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
A Prospective, Phase Ⅱ Study of S-1 Plus Moderately Hypofractionated Conformal Radiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
A Prospective Single-arm Phase Ⅱ Study of Toripalimab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibition of KiSS-1 on metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma implant tumor in nude mice.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
- Six fractions weekly as accelerated fraction radiotherapy: Is it applicable for nasopharyngeal cancer? A review.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2019Review
- Thyroid adenoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma with metastasis to cervical lymph nodes is misdiagnosed and treated for thyroid carcinoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Article
- Evaluation of nutritional status in head and neck radio-treated patients affected by oral mucositis: efficacy of class IV laser therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity and tolerability of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART)-intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Forty-five patients with stage II-IV NPC, determined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer system, were treated with prescribed doses of 72 Gy total to the gross tumor volume, 60 Gy to the clinical target volume and metastatic nodal station, and 54 Gy to the clinically-negative neck region. Before radiotherapy, two cycles of cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3) plus 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5) were delivered every three weeks for two cycles. Patients received two cycles of cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) day on days 1-3) every three weeks during radiotherapy. In addition, two cycles of cisplatin and 5-FU were given after radiation. All patients completed the prescribed radiotherapy and all scheduled cycles of chemotherapy. Thirty of the 45 patients (66.6%) had a complete response at the end of treatment. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in 4/45 patients (8.8%) and grade 3 dermatitis occurred in 5/45 (11.1%) during radiotherapy. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 6/45 (13.3%) during concurrent chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality. After a median follow-up time of 51 months, only three patients' treatments had failed. Local and distant failure rates were 1.5 and 3.0%, respectively. SMART-IMRT plus cisplatin and 5-FU chemotherapy showed promising activity with manageable toxicity. It is a feasible regimen and improves locoregional disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.