Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23425564›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2013

Effect of everolimus on bone marker levels and progressive disease in bone in BOLERO-2.

Michael Gnant, Jose Baselga, Hope S Rugo, Shinzaburo Noguchi, Howard A Burris, Martine Piccart, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Janice Eakle, Hirofumi Mukai, Hiroji Iwata and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Bone Effects of Anti-Cancer Treatments in 2024.Calcified tissue international · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Role of Altered Metabolic Microenvironment in Osteolytic Metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael GnantDepartment of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. michael.gnant@meduniwien.ac.at
Jose Baselga
Hope S Rugo
Shinzaburo Noguchi
Howard A Burris
Martine Piccart
Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Janice Eakle
Hirofumi Mukai
Hiroji Iwata
Matthias Geberth
Lowell L Hart
Peyman Hadji
Mona El-Hashimy
Shantha Rao
Tetiana Taran
Tarek Sahmoud
David Lebwohl
Mario Campone
Kathleen I Pritchard
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus 2 (BOLERO-2), a phase III study in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer progressing despite nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, showed statistically significant benefits with adding everolimus to exemestane. Moreover, in preclinical studies, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition was associated with decreased osteoclast survival and activity. Exploratory analyses in BOLERO-2 evaluated the effect of everolimus on bone marker levels and progressive disease in bone.

methodsPatients were treated with exemestane (25mg/day) and randomized (2:1) to everolimus (10mg/day; combination) or placebo (exemestane only). Exploratory endpoints included changes in bone turnover marker levels vs baseline and progressive disease in bone, defined as unequivocal progression of a preexisting bone lesion or the appearance of a new bone lesion.

resultsBaseline disease characteristics were well balanced between arms (N = 724); baseline bisphosphonate use was not (43.9% combination vs 54.0% exemestane only). At a median of 18 months of follow-up, median progression-free survival (primary endpoint) was statistically significantly longer with the combination vs exemestane only (Cox proportional hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.38 to 0.54; log-rank, 1-sided P < .0001). Bone marker levels at 6 and 12 weeks increased with exemestane only, as expected, but decreased with the combination. The cumulative incidence rate of progressive disease in bone was lower in the combination arm. Bone-related adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both arms (3.3% combination vs 4.2% exemestane only).

conclusionThese exploratory analyses suggest that everolimus has beneficial effects on bone turnover and progressive disease in bone in patients receiving exemestane for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer progressing during/after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAlkaline PhosphataseAndrostadienesAntineoplastic AgentsAromatase InhibitorsBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsBone RemodelingBone ResorptionBreast NeoplasmsCollagen Type IConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleAlkaline PhosphataseAndrostadienesAntineoplastic AgentsAromatase InhibitorsBone Density Conservation AgentsCollagen Type IEverolimusexemestaneMTOR protein, humanProcollagenReceptors, EstrogenSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID23425564
PMCPMC6430494
OpenAlexW2125047786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.