Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23425325›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2013

Preference for physician vs. nurse-initiated opt-out screening on HIV test acceptance.

Janni J Kinsler, Jennifer N Sayles, William E Cunningham, Anish Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Missed Opportunities for HIV Screening of New Enrollees in California's Low Income Health Program.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janni J Kinslera Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health , University of California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Jennifer N Sayles
William E Cunningham
Anish Mahajan

Funding

The Center for Health Improvement of Minority ElderlyP30AG021684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Homero Erwin del Pino · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
TRAINING COREP20MD000182 · NIMHD · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI MILBURN, NORWEETA GERMAINE, SHAPIRO, MARTIN F. · 2002 to 2016
$16.5M
Effectiveness of Peer Navigation to Link Released HIV+ Jail Inmates to HIV CareR01DA030781 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CUNNINGHAM, WILLIAM EMERY · 2010 to 2015
$4.5M
Culturally Sensitive Intervention to Improve Retention in HIV Care for Latino MSMR34MH089719 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CUNNINGHAM, WILLIAM EMERY · 2010 to 2012
$556k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021684NIA NIH HHS P30AG021684NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030781NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000182NIMHD NIH HHS P20MD000182NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH089719PHS HHS 07768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provider-initiated opt-out HIV screening suggests that providers should routinely order HIV tests unless a patient declines. However, data on how providers will respond to this new screening model are scarce. Documented concerns from the providers' perspectives have included time constraints of a typical patient encounter, and discomfort with discussing sexual history and risk behavior with patients. To address these potential barriers, nurse-initiated screening has been proposed as an approach to increasing screening rates in general medical and urgent care settings. This study compares patient acceptability of provider-initiated opt-out HIV screening with nurse-initiated opt-out HIV screening among 220 patients between the ages of 18-64 from two publically funded "safety-net" outpatient clinics in Los Angeles County. Our study found that 77% of patients agreed to HIV testing using opt-out screening, and that HIV test acceptance was higher with the physician-initiated opt-out model compared with the nurse-initiated opt-out model (adjusted odds ratios = 2.92; 95% CI = 1.37-6.22). These findings indicate that adding opt-out screening to primary care providers responsibilities may be an acceptable and effective strategy for addressing the perennially low HIV testing rates, particularly among low income, traditionally underserved patient populations among whom the epidemic is expanding most rapidly.

Indexed as

NursesPhysiciansAdolescentAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisEmergency Service, HospitalEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLos AngelesMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Preference

Identifiers

PMID23425325
PMCPMC3679256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.