ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2013
Emergence of novel domains in proteins.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small viruses reveal bidirectional evolution between HK97-fold viruses and encapsulins via procapsids.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From Codons to Protein Structure: Evolutionary Constraints of Mitochondrial Proteins in Corvides.Biology · 2026Article
- Emergence and evolution of protein-coding de novo genes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Integrative genomic analyses support the division of the extendedJournal of virology · 2025Review
- Molecular and evolutionary determinants for protein interaction within a class II aldolase/Adducin domain.PloS one · 2025Article
- Human lncRNAs harbor conserved modules embedded in different sequence contexts.Non-coding RNA research · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Identification of a Maize Chitinase Gene Family and the Induction of Its Expression byGenes · 2024Article
- Domain Architecture Based Methods for Comparative Functional Genomics Toward Therapeutic Drug Target Discovery.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- The Modular Architecture of Metallothioneins Facilitates Domain Rearrangements and Contributes to Their Evolvability in Metal-Accumulating Mollusks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- A computational exploration of resilience and evolvability of protein-protein interaction networks.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Structural and functional characterization of a putative de novo gene in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Modularity in Protein Evolution: Modular Organization and De Novo Domain Evolution in Mollusk Metallothioneins.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Evolutionary divergence of novel open reading frames in cichlids speciation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Domain-based Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Proteomes: Uniqueness, Interactions, and the Dark Matter.Current genomics · 2019Article
- New Genes and Functional Innovation in Mammals.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Genomic Evidence for Bacterial Determinants Influencing Obesity Development.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
- Evolution of Protein Domain Repeats in Metazoa.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Unmasking the ancestral activity of integron integrases reveals a smooth evolutionary transition during functional innovation.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProteins are composed of a combination of discrete, well-defined, sequence domains, associated with specific functions that have arisen at different times during evolutionary history. The emergence of novel domains is related to protein functional diversification and adaptation. But currently little is known about how novel domains arise and how they subsequently evolve.
resultsTo gain insights into the impact of recently emerged domains in protein evolution we have identified all human young protein domains that have emerged in approximately the past 550 million years. We have classified them into vertebrate-specific and mammalian-specific groups, and compared them to older domains. We have found 426 different annotated young domains, totalling 995 domain occurrences, which represent about 12.3% of all human domains. We have observed that 61.3% of them arose in newly formed genes, while the remaining 38.7% are found combined with older domains, and have very likely emerged in the context of a previously existing protein. Young domains are preferentially located at the N-terminus of the protein, indicating that, at least in vertebrates, novel functional sequences often emerge there. Furthermore, young domains show significantly higher non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rates than older domains using human and mouse orthologous sequence comparisons. This is also true when we compare young and old domains located in the same protein, suggesting that recently arisen domains tend to evolve in a less constrained manner than older domains.
conclusionsWe conclude that proteins tend to gain domains over time, becoming progressively longer. We show that many proteins are made of domains of different age, and that the fastest evolving parts correspond to the domains that have been acquired more recently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.