Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23424126›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2013

Spectral clustering strategies for heterogeneous disease expression data.

Grace T Huang, Kathryn I Cunningham, Panayiotis V Benos, Chakra S Chennubhotla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grace T HuangDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kathryn I Cunningham
Panayiotis V Benos
Chakra S Chennubhotla

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
Bridging Sequence Patterns and Structural DynamicsR01LM007994 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2004 to 2011
$3.0M
Modeling in vivo Protein-DNA Interactions from High-Throughput Data MP1/1R01LM009657 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BENOS, PANAGIOTIS V, KAMINSKI, NAFTALI · 2007 to 2011
$2.5M
Structural Dynamics of Biomolecular SystemsR01GM086238 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024153NIGMS NIH HHS GM086238NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086238NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007994NLM NIH HHS R01LM007994NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009657NLM NIH HHS R01LM009657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustering of gene expression data simplifies subsequent data analyses and forms the basis of numerous approaches for biomarker identification, prediction of clinical outcome, and personalized therapeutic strategies. The most popular clustering methods such as K-means and hierarchical clustering are intuitive and easy to use, but they require arbitrary choices on their various parameters (number of clusters for K-means, and a threshold to cut the tree for hierarchical clustering). Human disease gene expression data are in general more difficult to cluster efficiently due to background (genotype) heterogeneity, disease stage and progression differences and disease subtyping; all of which cause gene expression datasets to be more heterogeneous. Spectral clustering has been recently introduced in many fields as a promising alternative to standard clustering methods. The idea is that pairwise comparisons can help reveal global features through the eigen techniques. In this paper, we developed a new recursive K-means spectral clustering method (ReKS) for disease gene expression data. We benchmarked ReKS on three large-scale cancer datasets and we compared it to different clustering methods with respect to execution time, background models and external biological knowledge. We found ReKS to be superior to the hierarchical methods and equally good to K-means, but much faster than them and without the requirement for a priori knowledge of K. Overall, ReKS offers an attractive alternative for efficient clustering of human disease data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansNeoplasmsPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID23424126
PMCPMC4449339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.