ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2013
Identifying master regulators of cancer and their downstream targets by integrating genomic and epigenomic features.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of transcription profiles for the identification of master regulators as the key players in glioblastoma.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Identifying key multifunctional components shared by critical cancer and normal liver pathways via SparseGMM.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
- Inference of phenotype-relevant transcriptional regulatory networks elucidates cancer type-specific regulatory mechanisms in a pan-cancer study.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- Imaging-AMARETTO: An Imaging Genomics Software Tool to Interrogate Multiomics Networks for Relevance to Radiography and Histopathology Imaging Biomarkers of Clinical Outcomes.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Article
- Deep learning with multimodal representation for pancancer prognosis prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- The impact of DNA methylation on the cancer proteome.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of transcriptional metabolic dysregulation using The Cancer Genome Atlas.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Article
- Module Analysis Captures Pancancer Genetically and Epigenetically Deregulated Cancer Driver Genes for Smoking and Antiviral Response.EBioMedicine · 2018Article
- A novel statistical approach for identification of the master regulator transcription factor.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Article
- MethylMix: an R package for identifying DNA methylation-driven genes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Pancancer analysis of DNA methylation-driven genes using MethylMix.Genome biology · 2015Article
- Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features.Radiology · 2014Article
- Identification of ovarian cancer driver genes by using module network integration of multi-omics data.Interface focus · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vast amounts of molecular data characterizing the genome, epigenome and transcriptome are becoming available for a variety of cancers. The current challenge is to integrate these diverse layers of molecular biology information to create a more comprehensive view of key biological processes underlying cancer. We developed a biocomputational algorithm that integrates copy number, DNA methylation, and gene expression data to study master regulators of cancer and identify their targets. Our algorithm starts by generating a list of candidate driver genes based on the rationale that genes that are driven by multiple genomic events in a subset of samples are unlikely to be randomly deregulated. We then select the master regulators from the candidate driver and identify their targets by inferring the underlying regulatory network of gene expression. We applied our biocomputational algorithm to identify master regulators and their targets in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and serous ovarian cancer. Our results suggest that the expression of candidate drivers is more likely to be influenced by copy number variations than DNA methylation. Next, we selected the master regulators and identified their downstream targets using module networks analysis. As a proof-of-concept, we show that the GBM and ovarian cancer module networks recapitulate known processes in these cancers. In addition, we identify master regulators that have not been previously reported and suggest their likely role. In summary, focusing on genes whose expression can be explained by their genomic and epigenomic aberrations is a promising strategy to identify master regulators of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23424118PMC3911770W1510270256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.