Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23422068›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2013

Chemical shifts in biomolecules.

David A Case

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Simulation Reveals the Chameleonic Behavior of Macrocycles.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Data-Driven Molecular Dynamics: A Multifaceted Challenge.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Finding Our Way in the Dark Proteome.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David A CaseDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Biology and BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. case@biomaps.rutgers.edu

Funding

Solution and solid structures from NMRR01GM045811 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CASE, DAVID A · 1991 to 2016
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM45811NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMR chemical shifts are sensitive probes of structure and dynamics in proteins. Empirical models, based on a large database of measured shifts, take an input structure and provide increasingly accurate estimates of the corresponding shifts. Quantum chemical calculations can provide the same information, with greater generality but (currently) with less accuracy. These methods are now providing new ways to approach NMR structure determination, and new insights into the conformational dynamics of proteins.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsQuantum TheoryProteins

Identifiers

PMID23422068
PMCPMC3877577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.