ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2013
CNVeM: copy number variation detection using uncertainty of read mapping.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of the Advances and New Insights into Copy Number Variations in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- GIP: an open-source computational pipeline for mapping genomic instability from protists to cancer cells.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Current status of structural variation studies in plants.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Statistical Considerations on NGS Data for Inferring Copy Number Variations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- A genome-wide approach for detecting novel insertion-deletion variants of mid-range size.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- SRBreak: A Read-Depth and Split-Read Framework to Identify Breakpoints of Different Events Inside Simple Copy-Number Variable Regions.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Article
- Allele-specific copy-number discovery from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- CNV-CH: A Convex Hull Based Segmentation Approach to Detect Copy Number Variations (CNV) Using Next-Generation Sequencing Data.PloS one · 2015Article
- An NGS Workflow Blueprint for DNA Sequencing Data and Its Application in Individualized Molecular Oncology.Cancer informatics · 2015Review
- Identification of copy number variants in whole-genome data using Reference Coverage Profiles.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- mrsFAST-Ultra: a compact, SNP-aware mapper for high performance sequencing applications.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Computational tools for copy number variation (CNV) detection using next-generation sequencing data: features and perspectives.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Copy number variations (CNVs) are widely known to be an important mediator for diseases and traits. The development of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies has provided great opportunities to identify CNV regions in mammalian genomes. In a typical experiment, millions of short reads obtained from a genome of interest are mapped to a reference genome. The mapping information can be used to identify CNV regions. One important challenge in analyzing the mapping information is the large fraction of reads that can be mapped to multiple positions. Most existing methods either only consider reads that can be uniquely mapped to the reference genome or randomly place a read to one of its mapping positions. Therefore, these methods have low power to detect CNVs located within repeated sequences. In this study, we propose a probabilistic model, CNVeM, that utilizes the inherent uncertainty of read mapping. We use maximum likelihood to estimate locations and copy numbers of copied regions and implement an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. One important contribution of our model is that we can distinguish between regions in the reference genome that differ from each other by as little as 0.1%. As our model aims to predict the copy number of each nucleotide, we can predict the CNV boundaries with high resolution. We apply our method to simulated datasets and achieve higher accuracy compared to CNVnator. Moreover, we apply our method to real data from which we detected known CNVs. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to predict CNVs at nucleotide resolution and to utilize uncertainty of read mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.