ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2013
Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Experiential Discounting Task.
Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of test-retest reliability and stability of delay and probability discounting.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024Pooled it
- Baseline performance moderates stimulant effects on cognition in youth with ADHD.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021Trial
- Test-retest reliability of behavioral measures of impulsive choice, impulsive action, and inattention.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2013Trial
- Dissociating the relationship between time perception and decisions to delay gratification.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of impulsive choice: Experiments to explore and models to map the empirical terrain.Learning & behavior · 2023Review
- Reliability and validity of behavioral-economic measures: A review and synthesis of discounting and demand.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2023Review
- Moderate Stability among Delay, Probability, and Effort Discounting in Humans.The Psychological record · 2023Article
- Language about the future on social media as a novel marker of anxiety and depression: A big-data and experimental analysis.Current research in behavioral sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Neural Basis of Increased Cognitive Control of Impulsivity During the Mid-Luteal Phase Relative to the Late Follicular Phase of the Menstrual Cycle.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Experience Matters: The Effects of Hypothetical versus Experiential Delays and Magnitudes on Impulsive Choice in Delay Discounting Tasks.Brain sciences · 2019Article
- Playing a video game is more than mere procrastination.BMC psychology · 2019Article
- Integrating Preclinical and Clinical Models of Negative Urgency.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Review
- Vigour of self-paced reaching movement: cost of time and individual traits.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Decline of prefrontal cortical-mediated executive functions but attenuated delay discounting in aged Fischer 344 × brown Norway hybrid rats.Neurobiology of aging · 2017Article
- Altered experiential, but not hypothetical, delay discounting in schizophrenia.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2017Article
- Syntax for calculation of discounting indices from the monetary choice questionnaire and probability discounting questionnaire.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2016Article
- The genetics of impulsivity: evidence for the heritability of delay discounting.Biological psychiatry · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Delay discounting (the devaluation of delayed rewards) has been studied extensively using animal models with psychophysical adjustment procedures. Similar procedures have been developed to assess delay discounting in humans and these procedures most often use hypothetical rewards and delays. The Experiential Discounting Task (EDT) was developed to assess human delay discounting using real rewards and delays. In the present study we examined the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the EDT. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing it with a standard delay discounting task. The EDT had poor test-retest reliability and discounting rates obtained with this task were uncorrelated with those obtained in the standard delay discounting task. Area under the EDT discounting curve was negatively correlated with scores on a measure of boredom proneness (i.e., individuals prone to boredom more steeply discounted delayed money in the EDT). This correlation may underlie previous reports that discounting in the EDT is correlated with addictions, as some evidence suggests boredom proneness is correlated with gambling, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and sensation seeking. Boredom proneness scores were correlated with no other measure of discounting. These findings suggest the EDT measures a different construct than that measured by traditional delay discounting tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.