ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2013
The antibiotic prescription and redemption gap and opportunistic CRP point-of-care testing. A cross-sectional study in primary health care from Eastern Austria.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnoses Based on C-Reactive Protein Point-of-Care Tests.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Prevalence and resistance patterns of commensal S. aureus in community-dwelling GP patients and socio-demographic associations. A cross-sectional study in the framework of the APRES-project in Austria.BMC infectious diseases · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyse the frequency of C-reactive protein (CRP) rapid test use by general practitioners (GPs), the role of the test in the antibiotic treatment decisions and the efficacy of the test in a primary care setting, with special emphasis on the redemption rate of antibiotic prescriptions.
designFor this cross-sectional study, GPs documented their CRP test use for 2.5 years. In addition, demographic and the antibiotic prescription and redemption data of the patients were documented. Three groups were clustered according to the three possible CRP test results (1: < 10 mg/l, 2: 10-30 mg/l, 3: > 30 mg/l); analyses were conducted by using descriptive statistical methods and tests.
resultsThirty GPs documented 692 initial CRP tests. The antibiotic prescription rate was 9.2 % for the first, 71.7 % for the second and 98.7 % for the third group (p < 0.001). A difference between the patients of the three CRP groups according to the redemption rate of antibiotic prescriptions (30.8 vs. 62.7 vs. 64.0 %; p = 0.013) could be found, with the lowest rate in the first group. Overall, 16.3 % of the patients filled an antibiotic at a pharmacy that was not in accordance with the CRP test result documentation form.
conclusionThe CRP test results show an association with both the antibiotic prescribing and redemption behaviour. Noticeable was the antibiotic redemption behaviour of the patients: 36 % of patients with a CRP test result over 30 did not fill the antibiotic prescribed which is an important finding related to patients adherence and of special interest due to the fact that none of these patients had a hospital admission afterwards. On the contrary, nearly one-fifth of the patients who did not get an antibiotic in connection with the CRP test result finally filled an antibiotic prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23420528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.