ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2013
Diesel motor exhaust and lung cancer mortality: reanalysis of a cohort study in potash miners.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exposure-response estimates for diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer mortality based on data from three occupational cohorts.Environmental health perspectives · 2014Pooled it
- Diesel exhaust exposure and the risk of lung cancer--a review of the epidemiological evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014Pooled it
- Scoping Review of 5 Common Occupational Cancers and Their Related Exposures.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Article
- Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis.BMJ open · 2020Article
- The impact of alternative historical extrapolations of diesel exhaust exposure and radon in the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS).International journal of epidemiology · 2020Article
- The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study provides no evidence for an increase in risk for lung cancer in miners exposed to diesel engine emissions.European journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- The hidden impact of a healthy-worker effect on the results of the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study.European journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- Re: "The hidden impact of a healthy-worker effect on the results of the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study".European journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2015Article
- Occupational Exposure to Diesel Motor Exhaust and Lung Cancer: A Dose-Response Relationship Hidden by Asbestos Exposure Adjustment? The ICARE Study.Journal of cancer epidemiology · 2015Article
- Diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer risks - evaluation of the meta-analysis by Vermeulen et al. 2014.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the reanalysis is to reassess lung cancer risk associated with occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust in potash miners, while controlling for potential confounders such as smoking and previous occupational history. Our investigation is based on a cohort study of nearly 6,000 German potash miners, who were followed up from 1970 to 2001. The reanalysis also takes into account the employment periods before potash mining, in particular uranium mining. Different approaches (nested case-control study and Cox model) were used to adjust for confounding. The exposure estimates were recalculated, lagging the exposure by 5 years. Exposure groups were defined by tertiles of cumulative respirable elemental carbon (REC) exposure estimates and occupational categories, where exposure was estimated originally by representative measurements of total carbon for different occupations. The highest REC concentration was measured for production workers, about twice as much as for other occupations. The reanalysis revealed that while about 4 % of all study subjects had worked earlier in uranium mines, 10.3 % of later lung cancer cases did so. Although their absolute number was small, the corresponding relative risk estimator was significantly elevated. Our analysis did not show any notable association between cumulative REC exposure and lung cancer risk. Introducing cumulative REC exposure as a continuous variable into the conditional logistic regression model yielded an odds ratio of OR = 1.04 [0.70-1.53]95 % adjusted for smoking and previous employment. The study results give no evidence for an association between REC exposure and lung cancer risk. Only for very high cumulative dose, corresponding to at least 20 years of exposure in the production area, some weak hints for a possible risk increase could be detected. The study underlines the importance of assessing the entire occupational history in occupational studies, especially if the supposed dose-response-relationship is weak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.