Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23420499›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2013

Diesel motor exhaust and lung cancer mortality: reanalysis of a cohort study in potash miners.

Matthias Möhner, Norbert Kersten, Johannes Gellissen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diesel exhaust exposure and the risk of lung cancer--a review of the epidemiological evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Scoping Review of 5 Common Occupational Cancers and Their Related Exposures.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer risks - evaluation of the meta-analysis by Vermeulen et al. 2014.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthias MöhnerDivision Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany. Moehner.Matthias@baua.bund.de
Norbert Kersten
Johannes Gellissen
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the reanalysis is to reassess lung cancer risk associated with occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust in potash miners, while controlling for potential confounders such as smoking and previous occupational history. Our investigation is based on a cohort study of nearly 6,000 German potash miners, who were followed up from 1970 to 2001. The reanalysis also takes into account the employment periods before potash mining, in particular uranium mining. Different approaches (nested case-control study and Cox model) were used to adjust for confounding. The exposure estimates were recalculated, lagging the exposure by 5 years. Exposure groups were defined by tertiles of cumulative respirable elemental carbon (REC) exposure estimates and occupational categories, where exposure was estimated originally by representative measurements of total carbon for different occupations. The highest REC concentration was measured for production workers, about twice as much as for other occupations. The reanalysis revealed that while about 4 % of all study subjects had worked earlier in uranium mines, 10.3 % of later lung cancer cases did so. Although their absolute number was small, the corresponding relative risk estimator was significantly elevated. Our analysis did not show any notable association between cumulative REC exposure and lung cancer risk. Introducing cumulative REC exposure as a continuous variable into the conditional logistic regression model yielded an odds ratio of OR = 1.04 [0.70-1.53]95 % adjusted for smoking and previous employment. The study results give no evidence for an association between REC exposure and lung cancer risk. Only for very high cumulative dose, corresponding to at least 20 years of exposure in the production area, some weak hints for a possible risk increase could be detected. The study underlines the importance of assessing the entire occupational history in occupational studies, especially if the supposed dose-response-relationship is weak.

Indexed as

MiningAdultAir Pollutants, OccupationalCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesComplex MixturesConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicGermanyHumansInhalation ExposureLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureProportional Hazards ModelsAir Pollutants, OccupationalComplex MixturespotashVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID23420499
OpenAlexW2017640447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.