Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23420199›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2012

Small molecules, big roles -- the chemical manipulation of stem cell fate and somatic cell reprogramming.

Yu Zhang, Wenlin Li, Timothy Laurent, Sheng Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Reversing transgene silencing via targeted chromatin editing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experimental study on small molecule combinations inducing reprogramming of rat fibroblasts into functional neurons.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu ZhangGladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Wenlin Li
Timothy Laurent
Sheng Ding
Gladstone Institutes · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Elucidating cardiovascular phenotaypes employing genome editing of iPS cellsU01HL107436 · NHLBI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BALDWIN, KRISTIN KAY, TOPOL, ERIC JEFFREY · 2011 to 2015
$7.7M
Regeneration of Retinal Neurons by Chemically Induced Reprogramming of Muller GliR01EY021374 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DING, SHENG, REH, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$4.2M
Generation of human iPS cells by chemically defined conditionsR01HD064610 · NICHD · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DING, SHENG · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS EY021374NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021374NHLBI NIH HHS HL107436NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL107436NICHD NIH HHS HD064610NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the great potential of stem cells for basic research and clinical applications, obstacles - such as their scarce availability and difficulty in controlling their fate - need to be addressed to fully realize their potential. Recent achievements of cellular reprogramming have enabled the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or other lineage-committed cells from more accessible and abundant somatic cell types by defined genetic factors. However, serious concerns remain about the efficiency and safety of current genetic approaches to cell reprogramming and traditional culture systems that are used for stem cell maintenance. As a complementary approach, small molecules that target specific signaling pathways, epigenetic processes and other cellular processes offer powerful tools for manipulating cell fate to a desired outcome. A growing number of small molecules have been identified to maintain the self-renewal potential of stem cells, to induce lineage differentiation and to facilitate reprogramming by increasing the efficiency of reprogramming or by replacing genetic reprogramming factors. Furthermore, mechanistic investigations of the effects of these chemicals also provide new biological insights. Here, we examine recent achievements in the maintenance of stem cells, including pluripotent and lineage-specific stem cells, and in the control of cell fate conversions, including iPSC reprogramming, conversion of primed to naïve pluripotency, and transdifferentiation, with an emphasis on manipulation with small molecules.

Indexed as

AnimalsCellular ReprogrammingHumansSignal TransductionStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID23420199
PMCPMC4067267
OpenAlexW1985147449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.