Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23420185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2013

NEuronMOrphological analysis tool: open-source software for quantitative morphometrics.

Lucia Billeci, Chiara Magliaro, Giovanni Pioggia, Arti Ahluwalia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucia BilleciInstitute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council of Italy (CNR) Pisa, Italy.
Chiara Magliaro
Giovanni Pioggia
Arti Ahluwalia

Funding

VISUALIZATION TOOLS FOR AUTOMATED MOLECULAR MICROSCOPYP41RR008605 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAPADOPOULOS, PHILIP · 1994 to 2011
$28.1M
VOLUMETRIC CONTOUR-BASED SURFACE RECONSTRUCTIONP41RR004050 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PASQUALE, ELENA B · 1989 to 2011
$28.0M
DEVELOPMENT OF A 3-D CELL-CENTERED NEURONAL DATABASER01DA016602 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MARTONE, MARYANN E · 2003 to 2007
$3.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR004050NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008605NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphometric analysis of neurons and brain tissue is relevant to the study of neuron circuitry development during the first phases of brain growth or for probing the link between microstructural morphology and degenerative diseases. As neural imaging techniques become ever more sophisticated, so does the amount and complexity of data generated. The NEuronMOrphological analysis tool NEMO was purposely developed to handle and process large numbers of optical microscopy image files of neurons in culture or slices in order to automatically run batch routines, store data and apply multivariate classification and feature extraction using 3-way principal component analysis (PCA). Here we describe the software's main features, underlining the differences between NEMO and other commercial and non-commercial image processing tools, and show an example of how NEMO can be used to classify neurons from wild-type mice and from animal models of autism.

Indexed as

3-way PCAimage processingmorphometricsneuronssoftware

Identifiers

PMID23420185
PMCPMC3572679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.