Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23420041›Full record

ArticleHeart failure reviews2013

Viral genomes in the pericardial fluid and in peri- and epicardial biopsies from a German cohort of patients with large to moderate pericardial effusions.

Sabine Pankuweit, Alexandra Stein, Konstantinos Karatolios, Anette Richter, Volker Ruppert, Bernhard Maisch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart failure reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Etiologies, fluid characteristics, and outcomes of pericardiocentesis: a five-year retrospective study from a single center.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Idiopathic Pericarditis-an Autoinflammatory Disease?Current rheumatology reports · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Human Parvoviruses.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017
    Review
  14. Recurrent Pericarditis: Modern Approach in 2016.Current cardiology reports · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine PankuweitDepartment of Internal Medicine-Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care and Prevention, UKGM GmbH, Marburg, Germany. pankuwei@staff.uni-marburg.de
Alexandra Stein
Konstantinos Karatolios
Anette Richter
Volker Ruppert
Bernhard Maisch
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aetiology of pericardial effusion has been generally assessed by clinical work-up only, which leaves a large cohort of patients with "idiopathic" effusions virtually undiagnosed. In accordance with the ESC guidelines, this contribution intends to change this attitude. After therapeutic or diagnostic pericardiocentesis of 259 patients with large to moderate pericardial effusions, pericardial fluid, epicardial and pericardial biopsies, and blood samples were analysed by PCR for cardiotropic microbial agents. Cytology, histology, immunohistology of tissue and fluids and laboratory tests were performed. Of the 259 patients, 35 % suffered from an autoreactive aetiology, 28 % suffered from a malignant and 14 % from an infectious cause. Investigating all samples by PCR, we identified viral genomes in 51 (19.7 %) patients, parvovirus B19 (B19 V) being identified in 25 and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in 19 cases. In patients with a sole infectious aetiology (n = 36), B19 V was detected in 21 and EBV in 10 cases. When differentiating with regard to the material investigated for the presence of cardiotropic viruses, parvovirus B19 was most often detected in the epicardium and EBV was most frequently detected in the pericardial fluid independent from the final diagnostic categorisation. Bacterial cultures including tests for tuberculosis were all negative. Molecular techniques improve sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for the underlying aetiology in pericarditis patients with effusion. The identification of specific viral signatures will help to understand pathogenetic mechanisms in pericarditis and allow to tailor an adequate therapy beyond antiphlogistic treatment.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralPericardial EffusionAdultAgedCohort StudiesEndoscopyExudates and TransudatesFemaleGermanyHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedParvovirus B19, HumanPathology, Molecular

Identifiers

PMID23420041
OpenAlexW2012664766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.