Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23419893›Full record

ReviewBrain research2013

Factors influencing the cognitive and neural effects of hormone treatment during aging in a rodent model.

Nioka C Chisholm, Janice M Juraska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Cyclophosphamide and/or Doxorubicin in a Murine Model of Postchemotherapy Cognitive Impairment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nioka C ChisholmDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. nchisholm@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Janice M Juraska
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Cortical Aging, Estrogen and BehaviorR01AG022499 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI JURASKA, JANICE M · 2005 to 2009
$601k
NIA NIH HHS AG022499NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether hormone treatment alters brain structure or has beneficial effects on cognition during aging has recently become a topic of debate. Although previous research has indicated that hormone treatment benefits memory in menopausal women, several newer studies have shown no effect or detrimental effects. These inconsistencies emphasize the need to evaluate the role of hormones in protecting against age-related cognitive decline in an animal model. Importantly, many studies investigating the effects of estrogen and progesterone on cognition and related brain regions have used young adult animals, which respond differently than aged animals. However, when only the studies that have examined the effects of hormone treatment in an aging model are reviewed, there are still varied behavioral and neural outcomes. This article reviews some of the important factors that can influence the behavioral and neural outcomes of hormone treatment including the type of estrogen administered, whether or not estrogen is combined with progesterone and if so, the type of progesterone used, as well as the route, mode, and length of treatment. How these factors influence cognitive outcomes highlights the importance of study design and avoiding generalizations from a small number of studies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Hormone Therapy.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBrainCognition DisordersDrug Administration RoutesFemaleHormonesHumansLocomotionModels, AnimalPostmenopauseRatsHormones

Identifiers

PMID23419893
PMCPMC3672353
OpenAlexW1969807563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.