Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23419888›Full record

Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2013

Effectiveness of peer-led dissonance-based eating disorder prevention groups: results from two randomized pilot trials.

Eric Stice, Paul Rohde, Shelley Durant, Heather Shaw, Emily Wade

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Effects of a prototype Internet dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program at 1- and 2-year follow-up.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2014
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric SticeOregon Research Institute, USA. stice@psy.utexas.edu
Paul Rohde
Shelley Durant
Heather Shaw
Emily Wade
Oregon Research Institute · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention: Clinician-Led, Peer-Led, vs Web-Delivered R01MH097720 · NIMH · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2013 to 2017
$4.2M
Eating Disorders Prevention: An Effectiveness Trial for At-Risk College StudentsR01MH086582 · NIMH · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BUTRYN, MEGHAN, STICE, ERIC M · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH086582NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086582NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present preliminary trials tested whether undergraduate peer leaders can effectively deliver a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program, which could facilitate broad dissemination of this efficacious intervention.

methodIn Study 1, female undergraduates (N=171) were randomized to peer-led groups, clinician-led groups, or an educational brochure control condition. In Study 2, which improved a design limitation of Study 1 by using completely parallel outcome measures across conditions, female undergraduates (N=148) were randomized to either immediate peer-led groups or a waitlist control condition.

resultsIn Study 1, participants in peer- and clinician-led groups showed significantly greater pre-post reductions in risk factors and eating disorder symptoms than controls (M d=.64 and .98 respectively), though clinician- versus peer-led groups had higher attendance and competence ratings, and produced stronger effects at posttest (M d=.32) and at 1-year follow-up (M d=.26). In Study 2, participants in peer-led groups showed greater pre-post reductions in all outcomes than waitlist controls (M d=.75).

conclusionsResults provide novel evidence that dissonance-based eating disorder prevention groups led by undergraduate peers are feasible and produce greater reductions in eating disorder risk factors and symptoms than minimal-intervention control conditions, but indicate that effects are smaller for peer- versus clinician-led groups.

Indexed as

Cognitive DissonanceSelf-Help GroupsSocial SupportAdolescentAdultFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPeer GroupPilot ProjectsRisk FactorsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23419888
PMCPMC3917500
OpenAlexW2160754511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.