Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23419722›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2013

Commentary on "Long-term survival following partial vs. radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer." Tan HJ, Norton, EC, Ye Z, Hafez KS, Gore JL, Miller DC, Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI: JAMA 2012;307(15):1629-35.

Stephen Boorjian

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Adult Multicystic Nephroma: Case Report and Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015
    Article
  4. Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma: Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum Consensus.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen Boorjian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although partial nephrectomy is the preferred treatment for many patients with early-stage kidney cancer, recent clinical trial data, which demonstrate better survival for patients treated with radical nephrectomy, have generated new uncertainty regarding the comparative effectiveness of these treatment options. To compare long-term survival after partial vs. radical nephrectomy among a population-based patient cohort whose treatment reflects contemporary surgical practice. We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with clinical stage T1a kidney cancer treated with partial or radical nephrectomy from 1992 to 2007. Using an instrumental variable approach to account for measured and unmeasured differences between treatment groups, we fit a 2-stage residual inclusion model to estimate the treatment effect of partial nephrectomy on long-term survival. Overall survival and kidney cancer-specific survival. Among 7,138 Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage kidney cancer, we identified 1,925 patients (27.0%) treated with partial nephrectomy and 5,213 patients (73.0%) treated with radical nephrectomy. During a median follow-up of 62 months, 487 (25.3%) and 2,164 (41.5%) patients died following partial or radical nephrectomy, respectively. Kidney cancer was the cause of death for 37 patients (1.9%) treated with partial nephrectomy, and 222 patients (4.3%) treated with radical nephrectomy. Patients treated with partial nephrectomy had a significantly lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.85). This corresponded with a predicted survival increase with partial nephrectomy of 5.6 (95% CI, 1.9-9.3), 11.8 (95% CI, 3.9-19.7), and 15.5 (95% CI, 5.0-26.0) percentage points at 2, 5, and 8 years post treatment (P <0.001). No difference was noted in kidney cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 0.82; 95% CI, 0.19-3.49). Among Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage kidney cancer who were candidates for either surgery, treatment with partial rather than radical nephrectomy was associated with improved survival.

Identifiers

PMID23419722
OpenAlexW2078631983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.