Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23419717›Full record

ReviewAdvances in genetics2013

Polycomb group response elements in Drosophila and vertebrates.

Judith A Kassis, J Lesley Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
30.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Functional analyses of the polycomb-group genes in sea lamprey embryos undergoing programmed DNA loss.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Distinct accessory roles ofGenes & development · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Polycomb Recruiters Inside and Outside of the Repressed Domains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The role of O-GlcNAcylation in development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judith A KassisEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. jkassis@mail.nih.gov
J Lesley Brown
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Control Of Gene Expression During DevelopmentZIAHD005003 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI KASSIS, JUDITH ANN · 2009 to 2023
$16.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD005003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycomb group genes (PcG) encode a group of about 16 proteins that were first identified in Drosophila as repressors of homeotic genes. PcG proteins are present in all metazoans and are best characterized as transcriptional repressors. In Drosophila, these proteins are known as epigenetic regulators because they remember, but do not establish, the patterned expression state of homeotic genes throughout development. PcG proteins, in general, are not DNA binding proteins, but act in protein complexes to repress transcription at specific target genes. How are PcG proteins recruited to the DNA? In Drosophila, there are specific regulatory DNA elements called Polycomb group response elements (PREs) that bring PcG protein complexes to the DNA. Drosophila PREs are made up of binding sites for a complex array of DNA binding proteins. Functional PRE assays in transgenes have shown that PREs act in the context of other regulatory DNA and PRE activity is highly dependent on genomic context. Drosophila PREs tend to regulate genes with a complex array of regulatory DNA in a cell or tissue-specific fashion and it is the interplay between regulatory DNA that dictates PRE function. In mammals, PcG proteins are more diverse and there are multiple ways to recruit PcG complexes, including RNA-mediated recruitment. In this review, we discuss evidence for PREs in vertebrates and explore similarities and differences between Drosophila and vertebrate PREs.

Indexed as

Response ElementsAnimalsDrosophilaHumansPolycomb-Group ProteinsVertebratesPolycomb-Group Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23419717
PMCPMC4157523
OpenAlexW180065705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.