Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23418942›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Learning contextual gene set interaction networks of cancer with condition specificity.

Sungwon Jung, Michael Verdicchio, Jeff Kiefer, Daniel Von Hoff, Michael Berens, Michael Bittner, Seungchan Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sungwon JungIntegrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Michael Verdicchio
Jeff Kiefer
Daniel Von Hoff
Michael Berens
Michael Bittner
Seungchan Kim
Translational Genomics Research Institute · USArizona State University · US

Funding

Systematic Development of Novel, Druggable Cancer TargetsU01CA168397 · NCI · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI BERENS, MICHAEL E. · 2012 to 2016
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA168397-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying similarities and differences in the molecular constitutions of various types of cancer is one of the key challenges in cancer research. The appearances of a cancer depend on complex molecular interactions, including gene regulatory networks and gene-environment interactions. This complexity makes it challenging to decipher the molecular origin of the cancer. In recent years, many studies reported methods to uncover heterogeneous depictions of complex cancers, which are often categorized into different subtypes. The challenge is to identify diverse molecular contexts within a cancer, to relate them to different subtypes, and to learn underlying molecular interactions specific to molecular contexts so that we can recommend context-specific treatment to patients.

resultsIn this study, we describe a novel method to discern molecular interactions specific to certain molecular contexts. Unlike conventional approaches to build modular networks of individual genes, our focus is to identify cancer-generic and subtype-specific interactions between contextual gene sets, of which each gene set share coherent transcriptional patterns across a subset of samples, termed contextual gene set. We then apply a novel formulation for quantitating the effect of the samples from each subtype on the calculated strength of interactions observed. Two cancer data sets were analyzed to support the validity of condition-specificity of identified interactions. When compared to an existing approach, the proposed method was much more sensitive in identifying condition-specific interactions even in heterogeneous data set. The results also revealed that network components specific to different types of cancer are related to different biological functions than cancer-generic network components. We found not only the results that are consistent with previous studies, but also new hypotheses on the biological mechanisms specific to certain cancer types that warrant further investigations.

conclusionsThe analysis on the contextual gene sets and characterization of networks of interaction composed of these sets discovered distinct functional differences underlying various types of cancer. The results show that our method successfully reveals many subtype-specific regions in the identified maps of biological contexts, which well represent biological functions that can be connected to specific subtypes.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGene Regulatory NetworksCarrier ProteinsCholesterolDatabases, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsDown-RegulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansNeoplasmsReceptors, Cell SurfaceUp-RegulationVocabulary, ControlledCarrier ProteinsCholesterolDNA-Binding ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceRNF11 protein, humanRNF139 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23418942
PMCPMC3644282
OpenAlexW2129207361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.