ArticleBiochemistry2013
Energetics of the Escherichia coli DnaT protein trimerization reaction.
Article in Biochemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visualization of the complete preprimosome reveals the structural mechanisms governing DNA replication restart.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Visualization of the complete primosome reveals the structural mechanisms governing DNA replication restart.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of bacterial DNA replication restart.Nucleic acids research · 2018Review
- Thermodynamic Interrogation of the Assembly of a Viral Genome Packaging Motor Complex.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- Crystal structure of DnaT84-153-dT10 ssDNA complex reveals a novel single-stranded DNA binding mode.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Thermodynamic and structural characteristics of the Escherichia coli DnaT protein trimerization reaction have been quantitatively examined using fluorescence anisotropy and analytical ultracentrifugation methods. Binding of magnesium to the DnaT monomers regulates the intrinsic affinity of the DnaT trimerization reaction. Comparison between the DnaT trimer and the isolated N-terminal core domain suggests that magnesium binds to the N-terminal domain but does not associate with the C-terminal region of the protein. The magnesium binding process is complex and involves approximately three Mg(2+) cations per protein monomer. The observed effect seems to be specific for Mg(2+). In the examined salt concentration range, monovalent cations and anions do not affect the trimer assembly process. However, magnesium affects neither the cooperativity of the trimerization reaction nor the GnHCl-induced trimer dissociation, strongly indicating that Mg(2+) indirectly stabilizes the trimer through the induced changes in the monomer structures. Nevertheless, formation of the trimer also involves specific conformational changes of the monomers, which are independent of the presence of magnesium. Binding of Mg(2+) cations dramatically changes the thermodynamic functions of the DnaT trimerization, transforming the reaction from a temperature-dependent to temperature-independent process. Highly cooperative dissociation of the trimer by GnHCl indicates that both interacting sites of the monomer, located on the N-terminal core domain and formed by the small C-terminal region, are intimately integrated with the entire protein structure. In the intact protein, the C-terminal region most probably interacts with the corresponding binding site on the N-terminal domain of the monomer. Functional implications of these findings are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.