ArticlePloS one2013
The effect of the California tobacco control program on smoking prevalence, cigarette consumption, and healthcare costs: 1989-2008.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost Analysis of Motivational Interviewing and Preschool Education for Secondhand Smoke Exposures.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016Trial
- Estimating the return on investment of the New York Tobacco Control Programme: a synthetic control study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Gene-Environment Analyses Reveal Novel Genetic Candidates with Prenatal Tobacco Exposure in Relation to Risk for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Illuminating a Path Forward for Tobacco Nation: Projected Impacts of Recommended Policies on Geographic Disparities.Tobacco use insights · 2023Article
- Impact of Tobacco Smoking on Health Care Utilization and Medical Costs in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Coronary Heart Disease and Diabetes.Current medical science · 2022Article
- Importance of Accounting for Regional Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: The Case for Tailored Interventions.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Estimating the return on investment of the Bureau of Tobacco Free Florida tobacco control programme from 1999 to 2015.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Comparing Risk Factors for Past 30-day E-cigarette and Combustible Tobacco Use: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Texas Adolescent Tobacco and Marketing Surveillance Study (2014-2017).Texas public health journal · 2021Article
- Smoking trends in Mexico, 2002-2016: before and after the ratification of the WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Twenty-year health and economic impact of reducing cigarette use: Minnesota 1998-2017.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Smoking and cessation treatment among persons with and without HIV in a U.S. integrated health system.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2020Article
- Smoking Behavior in Low- and High-Income Adults Immediately Following California Proposition 56 Tobacco Tax Increase.American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Hookah and Electronic Inhalant Device Use and Perceptions Among African American Youth and Young Adults: Are We Asking the Right Questions?Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020Article
- The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017.PloS one · 2020Article
- The Minnesota SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Model of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarette Use.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Similar softening across different racial and ethnic groups of smokers in California as smoking prevalence declined.Preventive medicine · 2019Article
- The Role of Multiple Social Identities in Discrimination and Perceived Smoking-Related Stigma among Sexual and Gender Minority Current or Former Smokers.Drugs (Abingdon, England) · 2019Article
- Smoking Among Hispanic/Latino Nationality Groups and Whites, Comparisons Between California and the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018Article
- Sexual minority youth continue to smoke cigarettes earlier and more often than heterosexuals: Findings from population-based data.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious research has shown that tobacco control funding in California has reduced per capita cigarette consumption and per capita healthcare expenditures. This paper refines our earlier model by estimating the effect of California tobacco control funding on current smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption per smoker and the effect of prevalence and consumption on per capita healthcare expenditures. The results are used to calculate new estimates of the effect of the California Tobacco Program. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsUsing state-specific aggregate data, current smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption per smoker are modeled as functions of cumulative California and control states' per capita tobacco control funding, cigarette price, and per capita income. Per capita healthcare expenditures are modeled as a function of prevalence of current smoking, cigarette consumption per smoker, and per capita income. One additional dollar of cumulative per capita tobacco control funding is associated with reduction in current smoking prevalence of 0.0497 (SE.00347) percentage points and current smoker cigarette consumption of 1.39 (SE.132) packs per smoker per year. Reductions of one percentage point in current smoking prevalence and one pack smoked per smoker are associated with $35.4 (SE $9.85) and $3.14 (SE.786) reductions in per capita healthcare expenditure, respectively (2010 dollars), using the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) measure of healthcare spending. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Between FY 1989 and 2008 the California Tobacco Program cost $2.4 billion and led to cumulative NIPA healthcare expenditure savings of $134 (SE $30.5) billion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.