ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2013
Primary and secondary care: Breaking down barriers for our patients with chronic diseases.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining the family physician-specialist relationship amid the primary care crisis: Harnessing power for better collaboration.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Article
- Designing the learning of intraprofessional collaboration among medical residents.Medical education · 2022Article
- A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers' views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Other ways of knowing: Using critical discourse analysis to reexamine intraprofessional collaboration.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016Article
- [D'autres façons de savoir: L'analyse critique du discours pour réexaminer la collaboration intraprofessionnelle].Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23418247PMC3576950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.