Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23417703›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2013

Efficiency of flagging and dragging for tick collection.

Filipe Dantas-Torres, Riccardo Paolo Lia, Gioia Capelli, Domenico Otranto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Spatiotemporal and tissue-specific dynamics of bacterial communities in adult femaleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. First Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Systematic investigation of theOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Update on tick-borne pathogens detection methods within ticks.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  18. Epidemiology of ZoonoticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Filipe Dantas-TorresDepartamento de Imunologia, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, 50670-420 Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. filipe.vet@globo.com
Riccardo Paolo Lia
Gioia Capelli
Domenico Otranto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is acknowledged that data from field studies on tick ecology might be biased by collection methods, but actually comparative studies are still limited. Herein we assessed whether the efficiency of flagging and dragging varies according to tick developmental stage, species, season and habitat. Ticks were collected in three sites bordered by an oak forest. The abundance of ticks collected by each collection method varied according to tick species, developmental stage, season, and habitat. Flagging was in general more efficient in collecting adult ticks, especially in spring and winter. Females were more frequently collected by flagging in the meadow and grassland habitats and males in the man-made trail. Flagging collected significantly more adults of Dermacentor marginatus, Hyalomma marginatum, Haemaphysalis inermis and Ixodes ricinus. Flagging was more efficient in collecting D. marginatus and I. ricinus in spring, and H. inermis and I. ricinus females in both spring and winter. In summer and autumn tick abundances were generally similar, with the exception of D. marginatus female in autumn. Flagging was more efficient in collecting D. marginatus adults in the meadow habitat and in the man-made trail, and I. ricinus adults in the meadow and grassland habitats. Dragging was more efficient in grassland for R. turanicus. Our results suggest that variations in terms of collection method performance are associated to factors linked to tick behaviour, habitat characteristics, and climate. Field studies employing these collection methods should take this into account to avoid misleading conclusions about tick population dynamics and tick-borne pathogen transmission risk.

Indexed as

AnimalsEcosystemFemaleMalePopulation DensitySeasonsSpecies SpecificityTicks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.